Mode of delivery and neonatal outcomes in extremely preterm Vertex/nonVertex twins

Canadian Neonatal Network Investigators and the Canadian Preterm Birth Network Investigators

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Background: One of the controversies in the management of twin gestations relates to mode of delivery, especially when the second twin is in a nonvertex presentation (Vertex/nonVertex pairs) and birth is imminent at extremely low gestation. Objective: We hypothesized that, for Vertex/nonVertex twins born before 28 weeks’ gestation, cesarean delivery would be associated with a lower risk of adverse neonatal outcomes than trial of vaginal delivery. Our aim was to test this hypothesis by comparing the neonatal outcomes of Vertex/nonVertex twins born before 28 weeks’ gestation by mode of delivery using a large national cohort. Study Design: This work is a retrospective cohort study of all twin infants born at 240/7 to 276/7 weeks’ gestation and admitted to level III neonatal intensive care units participating in the Canadian Neonatal Network (2010–2017). Exposure is defined a trial of vaginal delivery for Vertex/nonVertex twins. Nonexposed (control) groups are defined as cases where both twins were delivered by cesarean delivery, either in vertex or nonvertex presentation (control group 1) or owing to the nonvertex presentation of the first twin (control group 2). Outcome measures are defined as a composite of neonatal death, severe neurologic injury, or birth trauma. Results: A total of 1082 twin infants (541 twin pairs) met the inclusion criteria: 220 Vertex/nonVertex pairs, of which 112 had a trial of vaginal delivery (study group) and 108 had cesarean delivery for both twins (control group 1); 170 pairs with the first twin in nonvertex presentation, all of which were born by cesarean delivery (control group 2); and 151 pairs with both twins in vertex presentation (vertex or nonvertex). In the study group, the rate of urgent cesarean delivery for the second twin was 30%. The rate of the primary outcome in the study group was 42%, which was not significantly different compared with control group 1 (37%; adjusted relative risk, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.71–1.22) or control group 2 (34%; adjusted relative risk, 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.92–1.58). The findings remained similar when outcomes were analyzed separately for the first and second twins. Conclusion: For preterm Vertex/nonVertex twins born at <28 weeks’ gestation, we found no difference in the risk of adverse neonatal outcome between a trial of vaginal delivery and primary cesarean delivery. However, a trial of vaginal delivery was associated with a high rate of urgent cesarean delivery for the second twin.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)613.e1-613.e10
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Issue number6
StatePublished - Jun 2021
Externally publishedYes


  • adverse outcome
  • mode of delivery
  • nonVertex
  • twins


Dive into the research topics of 'Mode of delivery and neonatal outcomes in extremely preterm Vertex/nonVertex twins'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this