Mitigating the problem of unmeasured outcomes in quality reports

Jacob Glazer*, Thomas McGuire, Sharon Lise T. Normand

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Quality reports or profiles of health care providers are inevitably based on only a measurable subset of the "outputs" of the organization. Hospitals, for example, are being profiled on their mortality in the cardiac area but not in some other areas where mortality does not seem to be the appropriate measure of quality. If inputs used for outputs included in the profile also affect outputs outside the scope of the profile, it can be taken into account in constructing a profile of the measured outputs. This paper presents a theory for how such a commonality in production should be taken into account in designing a profile for a hospital or other health care provider. We distinguish between "conventional" weights in a quality profile, and "optimal" weights that take into account a commonality in the production process. The basic idea is to increase the weights on discharges for which output is measured that use inputs that are important to other discharges whose outputs are not included in the profile.

Original languageEnglish
Article number7
JournalB.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy
Volume8
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2008

Funding

FundersFunder number
National Institute of Mental HealthR34 MH071242
Agency for Healthcare Research and QualityP01 HS10803
Harvard University

    Keywords

    • Hospitals
    • Partial reports
    • Quality reports

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Mitigating the problem of unmeasured outcomes in quality reports'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this