Missing objects in Hebrew: Argument ellipsis, not VP ellipsis

Idan Landau

doi:10.5334/gjgl.560

Missing objects in Hebrew: Argument ellipsis, not VP ellipsis

Idan Landau^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Ben-Gurion University of the Negev

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

24 Scopus citations

Abstract

Hebrew is standardly cited as a language exhibiting Verb-stranding VP-ellipsis (VSVPE). Systematic reassessment of the data demonstrates that all the alleged evidence for VSVPE is consistent with Argument Ellipsis (AE); furthermore, there are ample data that are only consistent with AE, and more revealingly, data that can only be explained if VSVPE is unavailable. Finally, the verb preceding the missing object need not match the antecedent verb, falsifying the “Verb Identity Requirement”. The conclusion that Hebrew employs AE (similarly to East Asian languages) but not VSVPE focuses attention both on the typology of AE and on the so-far hidden constraints against VSVPE derivations.

Original language	English
Article number	76
Journal	Glossa
Volume	3
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.560
State	Published - 2018
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

Argument ellipsis
Hebrew
Null objects
Verb-stranding VP ellipsis

Access to Document

10.5334/gjgl.560

Cite this

@article{33171cc8be7d415fbca5bf3b67682553,

title = "Missing objects in Hebrew: Argument ellipsis, not VP ellipsis",

abstract = "Hebrew is standardly cited as a language exhibiting Verb-stranding VP-ellipsis (VSVPE). Systematic reassessment of the data demonstrates that all the alleged evidence for VSVPE is consistent with Argument Ellipsis (AE); furthermore, there are ample data that are only consistent with AE, and more revealingly, data that can only be explained if VSVPE is unavailable. Finally, the verb preceding the missing object need not match the antecedent verb, falsifying the “Verb Identity Requirement”. The conclusion that Hebrew employs AE (similarly to East Asian languages) but not VSVPE focuses attention both on the typology of AE and on the so-far hidden constraints against VSVPE derivations.",

keywords = "Argument ellipsis, Hebrew, Null objects, Verb-stranding VP ellipsis",

author = "Idan Landau",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2018 The Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.",

year = "2018",

doi = "10.5334/gjgl.560",

language = "אנגלית",

volume = "3",

journal = "Glossa",

issn = "2397-1835",

publisher = "Open Library of Humanities",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Missing objects in Hebrew

T2 - Argument ellipsis, not VP ellipsis

AU - Landau, Idan

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2018 The Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Hebrew is standardly cited as a language exhibiting Verb-stranding VP-ellipsis (VSVPE). Systematic reassessment of the data demonstrates that all the alleged evidence for VSVPE is consistent with Argument Ellipsis (AE); furthermore, there are ample data that are only consistent with AE, and more revealingly, data that can only be explained if VSVPE is unavailable. Finally, the verb preceding the missing object need not match the antecedent verb, falsifying the “Verb Identity Requirement”. The conclusion that Hebrew employs AE (similarly to East Asian languages) but not VSVPE focuses attention both on the typology of AE and on the so-far hidden constraints against VSVPE derivations.

AB - Hebrew is standardly cited as a language exhibiting Verb-stranding VP-ellipsis (VSVPE). Systematic reassessment of the data demonstrates that all the alleged evidence for VSVPE is consistent with Argument Ellipsis (AE); furthermore, there are ample data that are only consistent with AE, and more revealingly, data that can only be explained if VSVPE is unavailable. Finally, the verb preceding the missing object need not match the antecedent verb, falsifying the “Verb Identity Requirement”. The conclusion that Hebrew employs AE (similarly to East Asian languages) but not VSVPE focuses attention both on the typology of AE and on the so-far hidden constraints against VSVPE derivations.

KW - Argument ellipsis

KW - Hebrew

KW - Null objects

KW - Verb-stranding VP ellipsis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074507979&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5334/gjgl.560

DO - 10.5334/gjgl.560

M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???

AN - SCOPUS:85074507979

SN - 2397-1835

VL - 3

JO - Glossa

JF - Glossa

IS - 1

M1 - 76

ER -

Missing objects in Hebrew: Argument ellipsis, not VP ellipsis

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this