TY - JOUR
T1 - Minimum nodal yield in oral squamous cell carcinoma
T2 - Defining the standard of care in a multicenter international pooled validation study
AU - Ebrahimi, Ardalan
AU - Clark, Jonathan R.
AU - Amit, M.
AU - Yen, T. C.
AU - Liao, Chun Ta
AU - Kowalski, Luis P.
AU - Kreppel, Matthias
AU - Cernea, Claudio R.
AU - Bachar, Gideon
AU - Villaret, Andrea Bolzoni
AU - Fliss, Dan
AU - Fridman, Eran
AU - Robbins, K. T.
AU - Shah, Jatin P.
AU - Patel, Snehal G.
AU - Gil, Ziv
N1 - Funding Information:
1Sydney Head and Neck Cancer Institute, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; 2Australian School of Advanced Medicine, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia; 3University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia; 4Laboratory for Applied Cancer Research, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Health, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; 5Department of Otolaryngology, Rambam Medical Center, Rappaport School of Medicine, The Technion Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel; 6Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan; 7Hospital A.C. Camargo, São Paulo, Brazil; 8Department of Oral and Cranio-Maxillo and Facial Plastic Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; 9Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil; 10Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel; 11Department of ENT, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy; 12Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; 13Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, IL; 14Head and Neck Surgery Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY ABSTRACT Purpose. There is evidence to suggest that a nodal yield\18 is an independent prognostic factor in patients with clinically node negative (cN0) oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) treated with elective neck dissection (END). We sought to evaluate this hypothesis with external validation and to investigate for heterogeneity between institutions. Patients and Methods. We analyzed pooled individual data from 1,567 patients treated at nine comprehensive cancer centers worldwide between 1970 and 2011. Nodal yield was assessed with Cox proportional hazard models, stratified by study center, and adjusted for age, sex, pathological T and N stage, margin status, extracapsular nodal spread, time period of primary treatment, and adjuvant
PY - 2014/9
Y1 - 2014/9
N2 - Purpose. There is evidence to suggest that a nodal yield <18 is an independent prognostic factor in patients with clinically node negative (cN0) oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) treated with elective neck dissection (END). We sought to evaluate this hypothesis with external validation and to investigate for heterogeneity between institutions. Patients and Methods. We analyzed pooled individual data from 1,567 patients treated at nine comprehensive cancer centers worldwide between 1970 and 2011. Nodal yield was assessed with Cox proportional hazard models, stratified by study center, and adjusted for age, sex, pathological T and N stage, margin status, extracapsular nodal spread, time period of primary treatment, and adjuvant therapy. Two-stage random-effects meta-analyses were used to investigate for heterogeneity between institutions. Results. In multivariable analyses of patients undergoing selective neck dissection, nodal yield <18 was associated with reduced overall survival [hazard ratio (HR) 1.69; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.22-2.34; p = 0.002] and disease-specific survival (HR 1.88; 95 % CI 1.21-2.91; p = 0.005), and increased risk of locoregional recurrence (HR 1.53; 95 % CI 1.04-2.26; p = 0.032). Despite significant differences between institutions in terms of patient clinicopathological factors, nodal yield, and outcomes, random-effects meta-analysis demonstrated no evidence of heterogeneity between centers in regards to the impact of nodal yield on disease-specific survival (p = 0.663; I2 statistic = 0). Conclusion. Our data confirm that nodal yield is a robust independent prognostic factor in patients undergoing END for cN0 oral SCC, and may be applied irrespective of the underlying patient population and treating institution. A minimum adequate lymphadenectomy in this setting should include at least 18 nodes.
AB - Purpose. There is evidence to suggest that a nodal yield <18 is an independent prognostic factor in patients with clinically node negative (cN0) oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) treated with elective neck dissection (END). We sought to evaluate this hypothesis with external validation and to investigate for heterogeneity between institutions. Patients and Methods. We analyzed pooled individual data from 1,567 patients treated at nine comprehensive cancer centers worldwide between 1970 and 2011. Nodal yield was assessed with Cox proportional hazard models, stratified by study center, and adjusted for age, sex, pathological T and N stage, margin status, extracapsular nodal spread, time period of primary treatment, and adjuvant therapy. Two-stage random-effects meta-analyses were used to investigate for heterogeneity between institutions. Results. In multivariable analyses of patients undergoing selective neck dissection, nodal yield <18 was associated with reduced overall survival [hazard ratio (HR) 1.69; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.22-2.34; p = 0.002] and disease-specific survival (HR 1.88; 95 % CI 1.21-2.91; p = 0.005), and increased risk of locoregional recurrence (HR 1.53; 95 % CI 1.04-2.26; p = 0.032). Despite significant differences between institutions in terms of patient clinicopathological factors, nodal yield, and outcomes, random-effects meta-analysis demonstrated no evidence of heterogeneity between centers in regards to the impact of nodal yield on disease-specific survival (p = 0.663; I2 statistic = 0). Conclusion. Our data confirm that nodal yield is a robust independent prognostic factor in patients undergoing END for cN0 oral SCC, and may be applied irrespective of the underlying patient population and treating institution. A minimum adequate lymphadenectomy in this setting should include at least 18 nodes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84906273549&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1245/s10434-014-3702-x
DO - 10.1245/s10434-014-3702-x
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 24728823
AN - SCOPUS:84906273549
SN - 1068-9265
VL - 21
SP - 3049
EP - 3055
JO - Annals of Surgical Oncology
JF - Annals of Surgical Oncology
IS - 9
ER -