Mind the gap: Bridging economic and naturalistic risk-taking with cognitive neuroscience

Tom Schonberg, Craig R. Fox, Russell A. Poldrack

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Economists define risk in terms of the variability of possible outcomes, whereas clinicians and laypeople generally view risk as exposure to possible loss or harm. Neuroeconomic studies using relatively simple behavioral tasks have identified a network of brain regions that respond to economic risk, but these studies have had limited success predicting naturalistic risk-taking. By contrast, more complex behavioral tasks developed by clinicians (e.g. Balloon Analogue Risk Task and Iowa Gambling Task) correlate with naturalistic risk-taking but resist decomposition into distinct cognitive constructs. We propose here that to bridge this gap and better understand neural substrates of naturalistic risk-taking, new tasks are needed that: are decomposable into basic cognitive and/or economic constructs; predict naturalistic risk-taking; and engender dynamic, affective engagement.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)11-19
Number of pages9
JournalTrends in Cognitive Sciences
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mind the gap: Bridging economic and naturalistic risk-taking with cognitive neuroscience'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this