Microsurgical management of penetrating peripheral nerve injuries: pre, intra- and postoperative analysis and results.

S. Rochkind, G. Filmar, Y. Kluger, M. Alon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


BACKGROUND AND METHODS: Clinical and electrophysiological motor function data were compared before and after microsurgical repair of penetrating peripheral nerve injuries. Sixty-four patients totaling 74 injured nerves (25 gunshot wounds, 49 stab wounds) were treated with external and interfascicular neurolysis and/or interfascicular nerve grafts. Microsurgery was performed 2-12 months after the injury (Group 1, 33 patients,) and 12 months-60 years after the injury (Group 2, 31 patients). The postoperative clinical and electrophysiological follow-up period ranged between 1 and 5 years. RESULTS: A statistically significant improvement in muscle strength occurred after the microsurgery, compared to before repair, gunshot wounds (p < 0.001), stab wounds (p < 0.001). Intraoperative and postoperative electrophysiological analysis showed statistically significant improvement. TIMING OF SURGERY: No statistically significant difference in muscle strength occurred between the 2 groups after the surgery, each showing statistically significant improvement, Group 1 (p < 0.001), Group 2 (p < 0.001). Patients above and below age of 40 showed an improvement in muscle strength after microsurgery, (p < 0.001) and (p < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSION: Microsurgery can progressively improve nerve function in penetrating peripheral nerve injuries and lead to significant functional improvement, even when it is delayed for more than one year after the injury.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)21-24
Number of pages4
JournalActa Neurochirurgica, Supplement
StatePublished - 2007


Dive into the research topics of 'Microsurgical management of penetrating peripheral nerve injuries: pre, intra- and postoperative analysis and results.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this