Methodological principles of case-control studies that analyzed risk factors for antibiotic resistance: A systematic review

Anthony D. Harris, Tobi B. Karchmer, Yehuda Carmeli, Matthew H. Samore

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

229 Scopus citations

Abstract

Case-control studies that analyze the risk factors for antibiotic-resistant organisms have varied epidemiological methodologies, which may lead to biased estimates of antibiotic risk factors. A systematic review of case-control studies that analyzed risk factors for antibiotic-resistant organisms addressed 3 methodological principles: method of control group selection, adjustment for time at risk, and adjustment for comorbid illness. A total of 406 abstracts were reviewed. Thirty-seven studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were reviewed and evaluated for the 3 methodological principles. Thirteen (35%) of 37 studies chose the preferred control group. Eleven adjusted for time at risk. Twenty-seven adjusted for comorbid illness. Future studies need to consider more closely the optimization of control group selection, adjusting for confounding caused by time at risk, and adjusting for confounding caused by comorbid illness.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1055-1061
Number of pages7
JournalClinical Infectious Diseases
Volume32
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Apr 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Methodological principles of case-control studies that analyzed risk factors for antibiotic resistance: A systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this