TY - JOUR
T1 - Meta-analysis
T2 - Enteral nutrition in active Crohn's disease in children
AU - Dziechciarz, P.
AU - Horvath, A.
AU - Shamir, R.
AU - Szajewska, H.
PY - 2007/9
Y1 - 2007/9
N2 - Background: Controversy exists surrounding the optimal treatment for inducing remission in active Crohn's disease. Aim: To review and update evidence on the effectiveness of enteral nutrition (EN) in treating active Crohn's disease in children. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library (up to February 2007) were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) relevant to Crohn's disease and EN in children. Results: We included 11 RCTs (n = 394). Seven RCTs (n = 204) compared EN with corticosteroid therapy. On the basis of pooled results of four RCTs (n = 144), we found no significant difference in the remission rates between groups (relative risk, RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.7-1.4, random effect model). Four RCTs (n = 190) compared two EN regimens. One of the four RCTs (n = 50) revealed a significant increase in the percentage of patients achieving remission in the total EN group compared with the partial EN group (RR 2.7, 95% CI 1-7.4). Because of lack of data, formal pooling of results was not possible for many outcomes (e.g., time until remission, duration of remission, growth data). Conclusions: Limited data suggest similar efficacy for EN and corticosteroids. As the number of patients needed to provide a definite answer is too large, future studies should focus on detailed outcome measurements including growth and quality of life.
AB - Background: Controversy exists surrounding the optimal treatment for inducing remission in active Crohn's disease. Aim: To review and update evidence on the effectiveness of enteral nutrition (EN) in treating active Crohn's disease in children. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library (up to February 2007) were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) relevant to Crohn's disease and EN in children. Results: We included 11 RCTs (n = 394). Seven RCTs (n = 204) compared EN with corticosteroid therapy. On the basis of pooled results of four RCTs (n = 144), we found no significant difference in the remission rates between groups (relative risk, RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.7-1.4, random effect model). Four RCTs (n = 190) compared two EN regimens. One of the four RCTs (n = 50) revealed a significant increase in the percentage of patients achieving remission in the total EN group compared with the partial EN group (RR 2.7, 95% CI 1-7.4). Because of lack of data, formal pooling of results was not possible for many outcomes (e.g., time until remission, duration of remission, growth data). Conclusions: Limited data suggest similar efficacy for EN and corticosteroids. As the number of patients needed to provide a definite answer is too large, future studies should focus on detailed outcome measurements including growth and quality of life.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548363947&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03431.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03431.x
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 17767463
AN - SCOPUS:34548363947
SN - 0269-2813
VL - 26
SP - 795
EP - 806
JO - Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics
JF - Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics
IS - 6
ER -