Megestrol acetate in advanced breast carcinoma after failure to tamoxifen and/or aminoglutethimide

George Brufman*, R. Isacson, N. Haim, E. Gez, A. Sulkes

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Scopus citations

Abstract

Seventy-three patients with metastatic breast cancer, whose disease progressed on hormonal therapy with tamoxifen or aminoglutethimide, were treated with megestrol acetate, 160mg/day. No complete responses were observed. Partial response was achieved in 3 patients (4%), for a median of 9 months (range 5-13). Thirty-five patients (48%) remained stable, for a median of 8 months (3-26). The remaining 35 patients (48%) had clear progression of their metastatic disease on therapy. Response to megestrol acetate was achieved in patients with metastases in bone and pleura only. There was no correlation between response to megestrol acetate and response to prior chemotherapy, prior tamoxifen therapy, previous treatment with aminoglutethimide, or hormone receptor status. The actuarial 24-month survival for all patients was 37%. The main side effects of megestrol acetate included weight gain (20% or over), pruritus, elevation of blood pressure, weakness, and vaginal bleeding; they were only occasionally observed. The objective improvement observed during this trial is disappointing; the only reasons to justify the use of megestrol acetate as second- or third-line hormonal therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer, would be the relatively long duration of disease stabilization in a large proportion of patients, and the low toxicity observed with the drug.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)258-261
Number of pages4
JournalOncology
Volume51
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1994
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Advanced breast cancer
  • Megestrol acetate
  • Second-line hormonal therapy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Megestrol acetate in advanced breast carcinoma after failure to tamoxifen and/or aminoglutethimide'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this