TY - JOUR
T1 - Medicolegal Aspects of Altered Sensation Following Implant Placement in the Mandible
AU - Chaushu, Gavriel
AU - Taicher, Shlomo
AU - Halamish-Shani, Talia
AU - Givol, Navot
PY - 2002
Y1 - 2002
N2 - Purpose: Altered mandibular sensation following implant surgery may result in liability claims. Therefore the authors conducted a retrospective analysis of all liability claims related to persistent altered sensation following placement of mandibular implants reported to the Medical Consultants International (MCI) Company from 1992 to 1999. Materials and Methods: Reports related to persistent altered mandibular sensation in 16 patients (12 women and 4 men) who underwent implant surgery in Israel were examined. The MCI files were retrospectively evaluated according to a structured form. The parameters studied included patient age and gender, implant location and length, imaging modality, and the time between actual damage and filing of a claim (ie, letter of demand or lawsuit). Results: The time in months between actual damage and filing of claim ranged from 0 to 60 months (mean 21.5 months). No cases were found involving transient changes in sensation. The female/male ratio was 3:1. Implant length was equal to or longer than 13 mm in 6 of 7 implants placed in the molar region. In the premolar area, nerve injury was evident in 6 of 7 cases where implants shorter than 12 mm were used. Conclusions: Transient nerve injury rarely results in legal action. Maximum effort should be devoted to accurately determining the appropriate implant length in the mandible.
AB - Purpose: Altered mandibular sensation following implant surgery may result in liability claims. Therefore the authors conducted a retrospective analysis of all liability claims related to persistent altered sensation following placement of mandibular implants reported to the Medical Consultants International (MCI) Company from 1992 to 1999. Materials and Methods: Reports related to persistent altered mandibular sensation in 16 patients (12 women and 4 men) who underwent implant surgery in Israel were examined. The MCI files were retrospectively evaluated according to a structured form. The parameters studied included patient age and gender, implant location and length, imaging modality, and the time between actual damage and filing of a claim (ie, letter of demand or lawsuit). Results: The time in months between actual damage and filing of claim ranged from 0 to 60 months (mean 21.5 months). No cases were found involving transient changes in sensation. The female/male ratio was 3:1. Implant length was equal to or longer than 13 mm in 6 of 7 implants placed in the molar region. In the premolar area, nerve injury was evident in 6 of 7 cases where implants shorter than 12 mm were used. Conclusions: Transient nerve injury rarely results in legal action. Maximum effort should be devoted to accurately determining the appropriate implant length in the mandible.
KW - Malpractice
KW - Mandibular implants
KW - Nerve injury
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036560379&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:0036560379
SN - 0882-2786
VL - 17
SP - 413
EP - 415
JO - International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants
JF - International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants
IS - 3
ER -