TY - JOUR
T1 - Mechanical trauma as a risk factor in classic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
T2 - Lack of epidemiologic evidence
AU - Kurland, Leonard T.
AU - Radhakrishnan, Kurupath
AU - Smith, Glenn E.
AU - Armon, Carmel
AU - Nemetz, Peter N.
N1 - Funding Information:
" Department of Health Sciences Research, Section of Clinical Epidemiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA, h Department of Neurology, Loma Linda Unicersity Medical School and Medical Center, and Jerry L. Pettis VA Hospital, Loma Linda, CA 92354, USA, and ' Facul~ of Commerce and Business Administration, Uniuersity of British Columbia, Vancouuer, B.C. V6T IZ2, Canada
PY - 1992/12
Y1 - 1992/12
N2 - We have examined the relationship between mechanical injuries and the subsequent development of classic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) through a critical review of the literature. Only prospective evaluation of a large cohort of trauma victims can provide an unbiased answer to this controversy. However, such an evaluation would be prohibitively expensive, and the results would not be available in our lifetime. The results of retrospective case-control studies are conflicting in part because of biases in the selection of patients and controls, poor definition of the nature and extent of the trauma and its chronological relationship to the onset of ALS, and a non-uniform approach to the collection of antecedent information. More rigorously designed studies show no association of ALS to antecedent trauma. The existing data thus do not suggest that mechanical trauma is a risk factor for ALS. Future case-control studies should conform to a standardized methodology. The critical analysis presented here of the research on the purported connection between mechanical injury and ALS may serve as a model for the evaluation of the role of trauma in other chronic diseases. Application of these methodological principles may bring increased scientific rigor to assessing the frequently litigated question of what constitutes a true trauma sequela.
AB - We have examined the relationship between mechanical injuries and the subsequent development of classic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) through a critical review of the literature. Only prospective evaluation of a large cohort of trauma victims can provide an unbiased answer to this controversy. However, such an evaluation would be prohibitively expensive, and the results would not be available in our lifetime. The results of retrospective case-control studies are conflicting in part because of biases in the selection of patients and controls, poor definition of the nature and extent of the trauma and its chronological relationship to the onset of ALS, and a non-uniform approach to the collection of antecedent information. More rigorously designed studies show no association of ALS to antecedent trauma. The existing data thus do not suggest that mechanical trauma is a risk factor for ALS. Future case-control studies should conform to a standardized methodology. The critical analysis presented here of the research on the purported connection between mechanical injury and ALS may serve as a model for the evaluation of the role of trauma in other chronic diseases. Application of these methodological principles may bring increased scientific rigor to assessing the frequently litigated question of what constitutes a true trauma sequela.
KW - Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
KW - Epidemiology
KW - Motor neuron disease
KW - Trauma
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0026676587
U2 - 10.1016/0022-510X(92)90241-C
DO - 10.1016/0022-510X(92)90241-C
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.systematicreview???
C2 - 1487752
AN - SCOPUS:0026676587
SN - 0022-510X
VL - 113
SP - 133
EP - 143
JO - Journal of the Neurological Sciences
JF - Journal of the Neurological Sciences
IS - 2
ER -