Measuring epistemic authority: studies of politicians and professors

Amiram Raviv, Daniel Bar‐Tal*, Alona Raviv, Reuven Abin

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

35 Scopus citations

Abstract

Two studies assessed the perception of epistemic authority (denoting a source of information which has a determinative influence on the acquisition of knowledge) by means of a scale (Epistemic Authority Scale) which was constructed for this purpose. The first study showed that individuals perceive political leaders with similar political orientations as greater epistemic authorities than political leaders with different political orientations. In addition, the study investigated the reasons used by the subjects to explain reliance or lack of reliance on political leaders. In general, the responses showed that leaders' expressed opinions and characteristics were important determinants in epistemic authority selection. The second study found that students of statistics departments have a greater tendency to perceive their professors as epistemic authorities in their disciplinary knowledge than students of psychology departments, while the latter are more likely than the former to perceive their professors as epistemic authorities in general knowledge domains. Analysis of the Reason scores for reliance on the professors in the two departments reveals that expertness received the highest ratings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)119-138
Number of pages20
JournalEuropean Journal of Personality
Volume7
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1993

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Measuring epistemic authority: studies of politicians and professors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this