TY - JOUR
T1 - Measuring distances
T2 - Hebrew essayists reading world literature
AU - Berdichevsky, Dina
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Prooftexts Ltd.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - In this article I discuss the late essayistic prose of two Hebrew writers, essayists, and readers of world literature—Leah Goldberg and Shlomo Grodzensky. Both of these writers belonged to a distinct generation of intellectuals in Hebrew literature. Grodzensky named this generation “the children of World War I.” This article focuses on their essays written during the 1960s, as they became the last representatives of world literature in the Israeli-Hebrew literary republic. Their work as unique writers and as members of their literary generation represented a critical moment in the history of Hebrew modern literature, a moment of renegotiation of the boundaries of national literature in a multilingual world. Goldberg’s and Grodzensky’s essayistic prose showed a new and empathic relation of the Hebrew text toward foreign words. Furthermore, a central claim in this article is that these writers’ self-estranged mode of mediation modestly posed a question mark over the very notion of a Jewish national unified native language.
AB - In this article I discuss the late essayistic prose of two Hebrew writers, essayists, and readers of world literature—Leah Goldberg and Shlomo Grodzensky. Both of these writers belonged to a distinct generation of intellectuals in Hebrew literature. Grodzensky named this generation “the children of World War I.” This article focuses on their essays written during the 1960s, as they became the last representatives of world literature in the Israeli-Hebrew literary republic. Their work as unique writers and as members of their literary generation represented a critical moment in the history of Hebrew modern literature, a moment of renegotiation of the boundaries of national literature in a multilingual world. Goldberg’s and Grodzensky’s essayistic prose showed a new and empathic relation of the Hebrew text toward foreign words. Furthermore, a central claim in this article is that these writers’ self-estranged mode of mediation modestly posed a question mark over the very notion of a Jewish national unified native language.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042665041&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2979/prooftexts.36.1-2.02
DO - 10.2979/prooftexts.36.1-2.02
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:85042665041
SN - 0272-9601
VL - 36
SP - 27
EP - 52
JO - Prooftexts - Journal of Jewish Literature History
JF - Prooftexts - Journal of Jewish Literature History
IS - 1-2
ER -