Measurements of intraocular pressure by Goldmann tonometry, Tonopen XL, and the transpalpebral tonometer, TGDc-01, after penetrating keratoplasty: a comparativye study.

Gabi Shemesh*, Michael Waisbourd, David Varssano, Adi Michaeli, Moshe Lazar, Shimon Kurtz

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained by Goldmann tonometry (GT), the Tonopen XL, and a new transpalpebral tonometer, TGDc-01, in eyes that had undergone penetrating keratoplasty (PKP). IOP was measured in post-PKP eyes by means of GT, Tonopen XL, and TGDc-01. Central corneal thickness measurements were also obtained for all eyes. Forty-five eyes of 43 patients were enrolled in the study. The mean IOP difference (+/-SD) was -0.42 +/- 5.83 mm Hg between GT and Tonopen and 3.20 +/- 7.55 mm Hg between GT and TGDc-01. The correlation coefficient was 0.84 between GT and Tonopen XL (P < 0.001) and 0.71 between GT and TGDc-01 (P < 0.001). Overall 2-way analysis of variance between the means showed no significant differences between the 3 devices (P = 0.077). A closer agreement was found between GT and Tonopen XL in post-PKP eyes. TGDc-01 yielded lower IOP readings than the other 2 devices. It remains uncertain whether this new transpalpebral tonometer is simply inaccurate or whether avoiding contact with the corneal graft by measuring IOP through the eyelid enables it to provide more accurate IOP readings than those obtained by transcorneal techniques.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)724-727
Number of pages4
JournalCornea
Volume28
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2009

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Measurements of intraocular pressure by Goldmann tonometry, Tonopen XL, and the transpalpebral tonometer, TGDc-01, after penetrating keratoplasty: a comparativye study.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this