TY - JOUR
T1 - Maxillary sinus augmentation in the presence of antral pseudocyst
T2 - a clinical approach
AU - Mardinger, Ofer
AU - Manor, Ifat
AU - Mijiritsky, Eitan
AU - Hirshberg, Abraham
PY - 2007/2
Y1 - 2007/2
N2 - Objective: The objective of this study is to present patients with sinus augmentation in the presence of an antral pseudocyst and the surgical procedure, complications, and outcome. Study design: From 2002 to 2005, 109 patients were scheduled for 1- or 2-stage maxillary sinus floor augmentation (n = 129) because of inadequate alveolar bone height for implant placement. Radiographically, a significant antral pseudocyst was shown. Results: In 8 (7.3%) patients, an antral pseudocyst was diagnosed, and in 2 a history of inactive sinusitis was found preoperatively. A faint dome-shaped radiopacity was found at the lower border of the maxillary sinus. Average lesion size was 5.09 cm2. All implants functioned well at follow-up (mean 20 months). Conclusion: A pseudocyst of the maxillary sinus is not a contraindication for sinus augmentation. The low frequency of sinus membrane perforation and postsurgery sinusitis make the operation safe. In large lesions and in cases with an unclear diagnosis, further evaluation is needed before sinus augmentation.
AB - Objective: The objective of this study is to present patients with sinus augmentation in the presence of an antral pseudocyst and the surgical procedure, complications, and outcome. Study design: From 2002 to 2005, 109 patients were scheduled for 1- or 2-stage maxillary sinus floor augmentation (n = 129) because of inadequate alveolar bone height for implant placement. Radiographically, a significant antral pseudocyst was shown. Results: In 8 (7.3%) patients, an antral pseudocyst was diagnosed, and in 2 a history of inactive sinusitis was found preoperatively. A faint dome-shaped radiopacity was found at the lower border of the maxillary sinus. Average lesion size was 5.09 cm2. All implants functioned well at follow-up (mean 20 months). Conclusion: A pseudocyst of the maxillary sinus is not a contraindication for sinus augmentation. The low frequency of sinus membrane perforation and postsurgery sinusitis make the operation safe. In large lesions and in cases with an unclear diagnosis, further evaluation is needed before sinus augmentation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33846327589&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.03.008
DO - 10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.03.008
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 17234532
AN - SCOPUS:33846327589
SN - 1079-2104
VL - 103
SP - 180
EP - 184
JO - Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology
JF - Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology
IS - 2
ER -