TY - JOUR
T1 - Maternal underweight does not adversely affect the outcomes of IVF/ICSI and frozen embryo transfer cycles or early embryo development
AU - Hoffman, Dana
AU - Kalma, Yael
AU - Samara, Nivin
AU - Haikin Herzberger, Einat
AU - Levi, Sagi
AU - Azem, Foad
AU - Amir, Hadar
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Objective: To compare assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes and preimplantation embryo development between underweight and normal-weight women. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 26 underweight women (body mass index [BMI] < 18.50 kg/m2) and 104 normal-weight women (BMI >20 and <24.9 kg/m2) who underwent a total of 204 in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycles and 358 fresh/frozen embryo transfers (ET) in our institution between January 2016 and December 2018. Statistical analyses compared selected ART outcomes (ovarian stimulation, fertilization, and pregnancy) between both weight groups. Morphokinetic and morphological parameters were also compared between 346 and 1467 embryos of underweight and normal-weight women, respectively. Results: The mean ± standard deviation age of the underweight and normal-weight women was similar (31.6 ± 4.17 vs 32.4 ± 3.59 years; p =.323). There were no differences in the peak estradiol levels, the number of retrieved oocytes, the number of metaphase II oocytes, and the oocyte maturity rates between the two groups. The IVF/ICSI fertilization rates and the number of embryos suitable for transfer or cryopreservation were similar for both groups. All morphokinetic parameters that were evaluated by means of time-lapse imaging as well as the morphological characteristics were comparable between low and normal BMI categories. There were no significant differences in pregnancy achievement, clinical pregnancy, live births, and miscarriage rates between the suboptimal and optimal weight women. Conclusion: Underweight status has no adverse impacts on the outcomes of IVF/ICSI with either fresh or frozen ET or on preimplantation embryo development and quality.
AB - Objective: To compare assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes and preimplantation embryo development between underweight and normal-weight women. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 26 underweight women (body mass index [BMI] < 18.50 kg/m2) and 104 normal-weight women (BMI >20 and <24.9 kg/m2) who underwent a total of 204 in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycles and 358 fresh/frozen embryo transfers (ET) in our institution between January 2016 and December 2018. Statistical analyses compared selected ART outcomes (ovarian stimulation, fertilization, and pregnancy) between both weight groups. Morphokinetic and morphological parameters were also compared between 346 and 1467 embryos of underweight and normal-weight women, respectively. Results: The mean ± standard deviation age of the underweight and normal-weight women was similar (31.6 ± 4.17 vs 32.4 ± 3.59 years; p =.323). There were no differences in the peak estradiol levels, the number of retrieved oocytes, the number of metaphase II oocytes, and the oocyte maturity rates between the two groups. The IVF/ICSI fertilization rates and the number of embryos suitable for transfer or cryopreservation were similar for both groups. All morphokinetic parameters that were evaluated by means of time-lapse imaging as well as the morphological characteristics were comparable between low and normal BMI categories. There were no significant differences in pregnancy achievement, clinical pregnancy, live births, and miscarriage rates between the suboptimal and optimal weight women. Conclusion: Underweight status has no adverse impacts on the outcomes of IVF/ICSI with either fresh or frozen ET or on preimplantation embryo development and quality.
KW - Body mass index
KW - IVF/ICSI
KW - embryo development
KW - fresh/frozen ET
KW - outcomes
KW - underweight
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85131270453&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/09513590.2022.2068522
DO - 10.1080/09513590.2022.2068522
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 35471122
AN - SCOPUS:85131270453
SN - 0951-3590
VL - 38
SP - 467
EP - 473
JO - Gynecological Endocrinology
JF - Gynecological Endocrinology
IS - 6
ER -