Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Management of Recurrent Retroperitoneal Sarcoma (RPS) in the Adult: A Consensus Approach from the Trans-Atlantic RPS Working Group

  • Trans-Atlantic RPS Working Group
  • Karolinska Institutet
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • University of Utah
  • Mayo Clinic Jacksonville, FL
  • Centre Léon Bérard
  • Institut Curie
  • IRCCS Fondazione Istituto Nazionale per lo studio e la cura dei tumori - Milano
  • University of California at Davis
  • Emory University
  • Treviso General Hospital
  • IRCCS Centro di Riferimento Oncologico - Aviano PN
  • University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
  • University of Toronto
  • University of California at Los Angeles
  • Brigham and Women’s Hospital
  • Leiden University
  • Moffitt Cancer Center
  • Istituto Candiolo
  • Ohio State University
  • Netherlands Cancer Institute
  • Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
  • University of Münster
  • Heidelberg University 
  • Department of Surgical Oncology & Thoracic Surgery
  • Centre Georges-François Leclerc
  • Roswell Park Cancer Institute
  • Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
  • University of British Columbia
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • University of Ottawa
  • IRCCS Istituto Europeo di Oncologia - Milano
  • University of Washington
  • IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas - Rozzano (Milano)
  • Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute of Oncology
  • University of Turin
  • University of California at San Diego
  • University of Southern California
  • Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, AZ

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

162 Scopus citations

Abstract

Introduction: Retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas (RPS) are rare tumors. Surgery is the mainstay of curative therapy, but local recurrence is common. No recommendations concerning the best management of recurring disease have been developed so far. Although every effort should be made to optimize the initial approach, recommendations to treat recurring RPS will be helpful to maximize disease control at recurrence. Methods: An RPS transatlantic working group was established in 2013. The goals of the group were to share institutional experiences, build large multi-institutional case series, and develop consensus documents on the approach to this difficult disease. The outcome of this document applies to recurrent RPS that is nonvisceral in origin. Included are sarcomas of major veins, undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma of psoas, ureteric leiomyosarcoma (LMS). Excluded are desmoids-type fibromatosis, angiomyolipoma, gastrointestinal stromal tumors, sarcomas arising from the gut or its mesentery, uterine LMS, prostatic sarcoma, paratesticular/spermatic cord sarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, alveolar/embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma, sarcoma arising from teratoma, carcinosarcoma, sarcomatoid carcinoma, clear cell sarcoma, radiation-induced sarcoma, paraganglioma, and malignant pheochromocytoma. Results: Recurrent RPS management was evaluated from diagnosis to follow-up. It is a rare and complex malignancy that is best managed by an experienced multidisciplinary team in a specialized referral center. The best chance of cure is at the time of primary presentation, but some patients may experience prolonged disease control also at recurrence, when the approach is optimized and follows the recommendations contained herein. Conclusions: International collaboration is critical for adding to the present knowledge. A transatlantic prospective registry has been established.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3531-3540
Number of pages10
JournalAnnals of Surgical Oncology
Volume23
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Oct 2016
Externally publishedYes

Funding

FundersFunder number
National Cancer InstituteK08CA168999

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Management of Recurrent Retroperitoneal Sarcoma (RPS) in the Adult: A Consensus Approach from the Trans-Atlantic RPS Working Group'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this