TY - JOUR
T1 - Magnetic resonance imaging of hindfoot involvement in patients with spondyloarthritides
T2 - Comparison of low-field and high-field strength units
AU - Eshed, Iris
AU - Althoff, Christian E.
AU - Feist, Eugen
AU - Minden, Kirsten
AU - Schink, Tania
AU - Hamm, Bernd
AU - Hermann, Kay Geert A.
PY - 2008/1
Y1 - 2008/1
N2 - Objective: To compare MRI evaluation of a painful hindfoot of patients with spondyloarthritides (SpA) on low-field (0.2 T) versus high-field (1.5 T) MRI. Materials and methods: Patients with SpA and hindfoot pain were randomly referred to either high-field or low-field MRI. Twenty-seven patients were evaluated (male/female: 17:10; mean age: 39 ± 1.4 years). Fifteen patients were examined by low-field and 12 by high-field MRI. Two patients (evaluated by high-field MRI) were excluded. Images were separately read by two radiologists who later reached a consensus. In each patient the prevalence of erosions, fluid, synovitis or bone marrow edema of the hindfoot joints, tendinosis or tenosynovitis of tendons, enthesitis of the plantar fascia and Achilles tendon and retrocalcaneal bursitis were recorded. Clinical and demographic parameters were comparable between both groups. Results: MRI evaluation of joints and tendons of the hindfoot revealed no significant differences in patients with SpA groups for all parameters. Analyzing all joints or tendons together, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Conclusion: Low-field and high-field MRI provide comparable information for evaluation of inflammatory hindfoot involvement. Thus, low-field MRI can be considered as a reliable diagnostic tool for the detection of hindfoot abnormalities in SpA patients.
AB - Objective: To compare MRI evaluation of a painful hindfoot of patients with spondyloarthritides (SpA) on low-field (0.2 T) versus high-field (1.5 T) MRI. Materials and methods: Patients with SpA and hindfoot pain were randomly referred to either high-field or low-field MRI. Twenty-seven patients were evaluated (male/female: 17:10; mean age: 39 ± 1.4 years). Fifteen patients were examined by low-field and 12 by high-field MRI. Two patients (evaluated by high-field MRI) were excluded. Images were separately read by two radiologists who later reached a consensus. In each patient the prevalence of erosions, fluid, synovitis or bone marrow edema of the hindfoot joints, tendinosis or tenosynovitis of tendons, enthesitis of the plantar fascia and Achilles tendon and retrocalcaneal bursitis were recorded. Clinical and demographic parameters were comparable between both groups. Results: MRI evaluation of joints and tendons of the hindfoot revealed no significant differences in patients with SpA groups for all parameters. Analyzing all joints or tendons together, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Conclusion: Low-field and high-field MRI provide comparable information for evaluation of inflammatory hindfoot involvement. Thus, low-field MRI can be considered as a reliable diagnostic tool for the detection of hindfoot abnormalities in SpA patients.
KW - Ankle
KW - Arthritis
KW - Low-field MRI
KW - Magnetic resonance imaging
KW - Spondyloarthritis
KW - Spondyloarthropathy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=37549014189&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.03.009
DO - 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.03.009
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 17466479
AN - SCOPUS:37549014189
SN - 0720-048X
VL - 65
SP - 140
EP - 147
JO - European Journal of Radiology
JF - European Journal of Radiology
IS - 1
ER -