TY - JOUR
T1 - Macromotives and microbehaviors
T2 - The social dimension of bacterial phenotypic variability
AU - Reuven, Peter
AU - Eldar, Avigdor
N1 - Funding Information:
Research in AE laboratory is supported by the International Human Frontier Science Program Organization Career Development award, by a Marie Curie reintegration grant and by the Israeli Academy of Science . PR is a VATAT post-doctoral fellow. We wish to thank D. Sprinzak, O. Shaya and S. Pollak for valuable suggestions and critical reading of the manuscript. We apologize to those of our colleagues whose works while highly regarded could not be cited due to the space limitations.
PY - 2011/12
Y1 - 2011/12
N2 - Bacterial phenotypic variability. - the display of multiple distinct phenotypes in a genetically homogenous population of bacteria. - emerges as an adaptive response to conflicting challenges. This creates an opportunity for social interactions which are able to dynamically redistribute cell fates within a community and to directly share the benefits of the different fates. While social interactions between cell fates can optimize community behavior, they also make the community vulnerable to exploitation. The aim of this review is to emphasize the social roles of phenotypic variability and introduce it as a communal rather than a single-cell property. Specifically, we present two prevalent perspectives on the forces shaping social interactions between cell fates. - engineering optimality and social stability. - and review recent works combining engineering, developmental and social evolution analyses in light of this distinction.
AB - Bacterial phenotypic variability. - the display of multiple distinct phenotypes in a genetically homogenous population of bacteria. - emerges as an adaptive response to conflicting challenges. This creates an opportunity for social interactions which are able to dynamically redistribute cell fates within a community and to directly share the benefits of the different fates. While social interactions between cell fates can optimize community behavior, they also make the community vulnerable to exploitation. The aim of this review is to emphasize the social roles of phenotypic variability and introduce it as a communal rather than a single-cell property. Specifically, we present two prevalent perspectives on the forces shaping social interactions between cell fates. - engineering optimality and social stability. - and review recent works combining engineering, developmental and social evolution analyses in light of this distinction.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=81955167445&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.gde.2011.09.011
DO - 10.1016/j.gde.2011.09.011
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.systematicreview???
AN - SCOPUS:81955167445
SN - 0959-437X
VL - 21
SP - 759
EP - 767
JO - Current Opinion in Genetics and Development
JF - Current Opinion in Genetics and Development
IS - 6
ER -