Lyapunov vs. geometrical stability analysis of the Kepler and the restricted three body problems

A. Yahalom, J. Levitan, M. Lewkowicz, L. Horwitz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In this Letter we show that although the application of standard Lyapunov analysis predicts that completely integrable Kepler motion is unstable, the geometrical analysis of Horwitz et al. [5] predicts the observed stability. This seems to us to provide evidence for both the incompleteness of the standard Lyapunov analysis and the strength of the geometrical analysis. Moreover, we apply this approach to the three body problem in which the third body is restricted to move on a circle of large radius which induces an adiabatic time dependent potential on the second body. This causes the second body to move in a very interesting and intricate but periodic trajectory; however, the standard Lyapunov analysis, as well as methods based on the parametric variation of curvature associated with the Jacobi metric, incorrectly predict chaotic behavior. The geometric approach predicts the correct stable motion in this case as well.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2111-2117
Number of pages7
JournalPhysics Letters, Section A: General, Atomic and Solid State Physics
Volume375
Issue number21
DOIs
StatePublished - 23 May 2011

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Lyapunov vs. geometrical stability analysis of the Kepler and the restricted three body problems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this