Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Lung Transplantation in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Patients in the European MultiPartner IPF Registry: Challenges for Health Equity

  • Nóra M. Tóth*
  • , Mordechai R. Kramer
  • , Martina Šterclová
  • , Veronika Müller*
  • , Katarzyna B. Lewandowska
  • , Nesrin Mogulkoc
  • , Marta Hájková
  • , Michael Studnicka
  • , Jasna Tekavec-Trkanjec
  • , Sanja Dimic-Janjic
  • , Anton Penev
  • , Zoran Arsovski
  • , Jakub Gregor
  • , Petra Ovesná
  • , Martina Koziar Vašáková
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Semmelweis University
  • Rabin Medical Center Israel
  • Thomayer University Hospital
  • National Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases
  • Ege University
  • University Hospital in Bratislava
  • Paracelsus Private Medical University
  • University Hospital Dubrava
  • University of Belgrade
  • Clinical Center of Serbia
  • Acibadem City Clinic Tokuda Hospital
  • SS Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje
  • Masaryk University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Despite advancements in pharmacological therapy, lung transplantation (LuTX) remains the only life-prolonging treatment in end-stage idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). However, real-world referral patterns in Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries remain poorly characterized. We aimed to comprehensively review factors influencing referral and identify systemic barriers to LuTX access. Methods: Baseline characteristics of IPF patients potentially eligible for LuTX, enrolled in the European MultiPartner IPF Registry between 2012 and 2022 (n = 1256), were retrospectively analyzed. LuTX (n = 94) and potentially eligible but not transplanted (n = 1162) subgroups were compared. National experts also completed a questionnaire assessing transplant referral and listing practices across different healthcare systems. Results: Only 7.5% of potentially eligible subjects were transplanted, revealing substantial geographic disparities, with Israel having the highest rates (43.1%), followed by Austria (9.5%), Hungary (7.8%), and the Czech Republic (4.6%). LuTX patients were younger (60.2 ± 7.4 vs. 62.6 ± 6.2 years, p < 0.001), had worse lung function (FVC 60 ± 15 vs. 74 ± 21% predicted; p < 0.001, TLCO 41 ± 15 vs. 49 ± 19% predicted; p < 0.001), and were more likely to receive antifibrotic and oxygen therapies. The most frequent reasons for exclusion from referral/listing were age > 70 years and concomitant heart/renal failure. Conclusions: This first comprehensive CEE analysis demonstrates low IPF transplant rates with high inter-country variability. Patients presenting early with functionally advanced disease are more likely transplanted, while advanced age remains the primary exclusion factor, highlighting critical access gaps potentially contributing to regional outcome differences.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2684
JournalBiomedicines
Volume13
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2025
Externally publishedYes

Funding

Funders
Boehringer Ingelheim
F. Hoffmann-La Roche

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
    2. SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
      SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities

    Keywords

    • geographic disparities
    • healthcare access
    • idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
    • lung transplantation
    • transplant referral

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Lung Transplantation in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Patients in the European MultiPartner IPF Registry: Challenges for Health Equity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this