TY - JOUR
T1 - Long-term implications of cumulative right ventricular pacing among patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
AU - Barsheshet, Alon
AU - Moss, Arthur J.
AU - McNitt, Scott
AU - Jons, Christian
AU - Glikson, Michael
AU - Klein, Helmut U.
AU - Huang, David T.
AU - Steinberg, Jonathan S.
AU - Brown, Mary W.
AU - Zareba, Wojciech
AU - Goldenberg, Ilan
N1 - Funding Information:
MADIT-II was supported by a research grant from Boston Scientific Corp. (St. Paul, Minnesota) to the University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry. The present long-term study was not funded by Boston Scientific Corp. Dr. Moss reports receiving grant support from Boston Scientific and lecture fees from Boston Scientific , Medtronic , and St. Jude Medical ; Dr. Huang lecture fees from Boston Scientific and consultant fees from St. Jude ; Dr. Steinberg lecture and consultant fees and grant support from Boston Scientific and lecture fees from Medtronic , St. Jude Medical , and Biotronik ; and Dr. Zareba research grant and lecture fees from Boston Scientific , and grant support from Medtronic . This research was performed while Dr. Barsheshet was a Mirowski-Moss Career Development Awardee at the University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
PY - 2011/2
Y1 - 2011/2
N2 - Background Limited data regarding the effect of right ventricular pacing (RVP) on long-term survival following implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation are available. Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of RVP on the long-term survival benefit of primary ICD therapy. Methods Mortality data were obtained for all patients enrolled in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Trial-II (MADIT-II) during an extended follow-up period of 8 years. The cumulative percent RVP during the trial was categorized as low (≤50% [n = 369]) and high (>50% [n = 198]). The benefit of ICD versus non-ICD therapy (n = 490) was evaluated in the two pacing categories during the early (03 years) and late (48 years) phases of the extended follow-up period. Results During the early phase of the extended follow-up period, ICD therapy was associated with similar benefits in the low-RVP and high-RVP subgroups (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.35 and 0.38, respectively, P <.001 for both). In contrast, during the late phase, the long-term survival benefit of the ICD was maintained among patients with low RVP (HR = 0.60, P <.001) and attenuated among those with the high RVP (HR = 0.89, P = .45). An increased risk for late mortality associated with high versus low RVP was evident only among patients without left bundle branch [LBBB] at enrollment (HR = 1.63, P = .002). Conclusion Among ICD recipients, high RVP is associated with a significant increase in the risk of long-term mortality and with attenuated device efficacy. The deleterious effects of RVP are pronounced mainly in non-LBBB patients, suggesting a possible role for combined cardiac resynchronizationdefibrillator therapy in this population.
AB - Background Limited data regarding the effect of right ventricular pacing (RVP) on long-term survival following implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation are available. Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of RVP on the long-term survival benefit of primary ICD therapy. Methods Mortality data were obtained for all patients enrolled in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Trial-II (MADIT-II) during an extended follow-up period of 8 years. The cumulative percent RVP during the trial was categorized as low (≤50% [n = 369]) and high (>50% [n = 198]). The benefit of ICD versus non-ICD therapy (n = 490) was evaluated in the two pacing categories during the early (03 years) and late (48 years) phases of the extended follow-up period. Results During the early phase of the extended follow-up period, ICD therapy was associated with similar benefits in the low-RVP and high-RVP subgroups (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.35 and 0.38, respectively, P <.001 for both). In contrast, during the late phase, the long-term survival benefit of the ICD was maintained among patients with low RVP (HR = 0.60, P <.001) and attenuated among those with the high RVP (HR = 0.89, P = .45). An increased risk for late mortality associated with high versus low RVP was evident only among patients without left bundle branch [LBBB] at enrollment (HR = 1.63, P = .002). Conclusion Among ICD recipients, high RVP is associated with a significant increase in the risk of long-term mortality and with attenuated device efficacy. The deleterious effects of RVP are pronounced mainly in non-LBBB patients, suggesting a possible role for combined cardiac resynchronizationdefibrillator therapy in this population.
KW - Heart failure
KW - Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
KW - Right ventricular pacing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79251556565&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.10.035
DO - 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.10.035
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:79251556565
SN - 1547-5271
VL - 8
SP - 212
EP - 218
JO - Heart Rhythm
JF - Heart Rhythm
IS - 2
ER -