TY - JOUR
T1 - Lomustine Nanoparticles Enable Both Bone Marrow Sparing and High Brain Drug Levels - A Strategy for Brain Cancer Treatments
AU - Fisusi, Funmilola A.
AU - Siew, Adeline
AU - Chooi, Kar Wai
AU - Okubanjo, Omotunde
AU - Garrett, Natalie
AU - Lalatsa, Katerina
AU - Serrano, Dolores
AU - Summers, Ian
AU - Moger, Julian
AU - Stapleton, Paul
AU - Satchi-Fainaro, Ronit
AU - Schätzlein, Andreas G.
AU - Uchegbu, Ijeoma F.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 The Author(s).
PY - 2016/5/1
Y1 - 2016/5/1
N2 - Purpose: The blood brain barrier compromises glioblastoma chemotherapy. However high blood concentrations of lipophilic, alkylating drugs result in brain uptake, but cause myelosuppression. We hypothesised that nanoparticles could achieve therapeutic brain concentrations without dose-limiting myelosuppression. Methods: Mice were dosed with either intravenous lomustine Molecular Envelope Technology (MET) nanoparticles (13 mg kg-1) or ethanolic lomustine (6.5 mg kg-1) and tissues analysed. Efficacy was assessed in an orthotopic U-87 MG glioblastoma model, following intravenous MET lomustine (daily 13 mg kg-1) or ethanolic lomustine (daily 1.2 mg kg-1 - the highest repeated dose possible). Myelosuppression and MET particle macrophage uptake were also investigated. Results: The MET formulation resulted in modest brain targeting (brain/ bone AUC0-4h ratios for MET and ethanolic lomustine = 0.90 and 0.53 respectively and brain/ liver AUC0-4h ratios for MET and ethanolic lomustine = 0.24 and 0.15 respectively). The MET formulation significantly increased mice (U-87 MG tumours) survival times; with MET lomustine, ethanolic lomustine and untreated mean survival times of 33.2, 22.5 and 21.3 days respectively and there were no material treatment-related differences in blood and femoral cell counts. Macrophage uptake is slower for MET nanoparticles than for liposomes. Conclusions: Particulate drug formulations improved brain tumour therapy without major bone marrow toxicity.
AB - Purpose: The blood brain barrier compromises glioblastoma chemotherapy. However high blood concentrations of lipophilic, alkylating drugs result in brain uptake, but cause myelosuppression. We hypothesised that nanoparticles could achieve therapeutic brain concentrations without dose-limiting myelosuppression. Methods: Mice were dosed with either intravenous lomustine Molecular Envelope Technology (MET) nanoparticles (13 mg kg-1) or ethanolic lomustine (6.5 mg kg-1) and tissues analysed. Efficacy was assessed in an orthotopic U-87 MG glioblastoma model, following intravenous MET lomustine (daily 13 mg kg-1) or ethanolic lomustine (daily 1.2 mg kg-1 - the highest repeated dose possible). Myelosuppression and MET particle macrophage uptake were also investigated. Results: The MET formulation resulted in modest brain targeting (brain/ bone AUC0-4h ratios for MET and ethanolic lomustine = 0.90 and 0.53 respectively and brain/ liver AUC0-4h ratios for MET and ethanolic lomustine = 0.24 and 0.15 respectively). The MET formulation significantly increased mice (U-87 MG tumours) survival times; with MET lomustine, ethanolic lomustine and untreated mean survival times of 33.2, 22.5 and 21.3 days respectively and there were no material treatment-related differences in blood and femoral cell counts. Macrophage uptake is slower for MET nanoparticles than for liposomes. Conclusions: Particulate drug formulations improved brain tumour therapy without major bone marrow toxicity.
KW - glioblastoma multiforme
KW - lomustine
KW - molecular envelope technology (MET)
KW - myelosuppression
KW - nanoparticles
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959097190&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11095-016-1872-x
DO - 10.1007/s11095-016-1872-x
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:84959097190
SN - 0724-8741
VL - 33
SP - 1289
EP - 1303
JO - Pharmaceutical Research
JF - Pharmaceutical Research
IS - 5
ER -