TY - JOUR
T1 - Local Nash equilibrium in multiparty politics
AU - Schofield, Norman
AU - Sened, Itai
N1 - Funding Information:
Empirical research discussed in this paper was done in collaboration with Andrew Martin, David Nixon, Dganit Ofek, Robert Parks, Kevin Quinn and Andrew Whitford, with support from NSF Grant SBR 98-18582. We appreciate the helpful comments of Jeff Banks, John Duggan, and Roger Myerson. Versions of the paper were presented at the 3rd International Conference on Game Theory, Barcelona, June 1998; at the 12th World Congress of the International Economic Association, Buenos Aires, 1999; and at the Meeting of the Society for Public Economic Theory, University of Warwick, July 2000, and at the Meeting of the Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory, Ischia, Italy, July 2001.
PY - 2002
Y1 - 2002
N2 - We present a model of multi-party, "spatial" competition under proportional rule with both electoral and coalitional risk. Each party consists of a set of delegates with heterogeneous policy preferences. These delegates choose one delegate as leader or agent. This agent announces the policy declaration (or manifesto) to the electorate prior to the election. The choice of the agent by each party elite is assumed to be a local Nash equilibrium to a game form g̃. This game form encapsulates beliefs of the party elite about the nature of both electoral risk and the post-election coalition bargaining game. It is demonstrated, under the assumption that g̃ is smooth, that, for almost all parameter values, a locally isolated, local Nash equilibrium exists. In the final section of the paper some empirical work is reviewed in order to obtain some insights into why parties do not simply converge to an electoral center in order to maximize expected vote shares.
AB - We present a model of multi-party, "spatial" competition under proportional rule with both electoral and coalitional risk. Each party consists of a set of delegates with heterogeneous policy preferences. These delegates choose one delegate as leader or agent. This agent announces the policy declaration (or manifesto) to the electorate prior to the election. The choice of the agent by each party elite is assumed to be a local Nash equilibrium to a game form g̃. This game form encapsulates beliefs of the party elite about the nature of both electoral risk and the post-election coalition bargaining game. It is demonstrated, under the assumption that g̃ is smooth, that, for almost all parameter values, a locally isolated, local Nash equilibrium exists. In the final section of the paper some empirical work is reviewed in order to obtain some insights into why parties do not simply converge to an electoral center in order to maximize expected vote shares.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037761470&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1023/A:1016304319551
DO - 10.1023/A:1016304319551
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:0037761470
SN - 0254-5330
VL - 109
SP - 193
EP - 211
JO - Annals of Operations Research
JF - Annals of Operations Research
IS - 1-4
ER -