TY - JOUR
T1 - LINCS
T2 - L-NAME (a NO synthase inhibitor) in the treatment of refractory cardiogenic shock: A prospective randomized study
AU - Cotter, Gad
AU - Kaluski, Edo
AU - Milo, Olga
AU - Blatt, Alex
AU - Salah, Ahmed
AU - Hendler, Alberto
AU - Krakover, Rikardo
AU - Golick, Ahuva
AU - Vered, Zvi
PY - 2003/7
Y1 - 2003/7
N2 - Aims: To evaluate the effect of L-NAME (a nitric oxide syntahse inhibitor) in the treatment of refractory cardiogenic shock. Methods and results: We enrolled 30 consecutive patients with refractory cardiogenic shock (systolic blood pressure that deteriorated progressively to <100 mmHg during an acute coronary syndrome despite maximal percutaneous coronary revascularization, intra aortic balloon pump, and IV dopamine, furosemide and fluids treatment for at least 1 h, accompanied by signs of peripheral hypoperfusion). Patients were randomized to supportive care alone (n=15, control group) or to supportive care in addition to L-NAME (1 mg/Kg bolus and 1 mg/Kg/h continuous IV drip for 5 h n=15). Death at one month was 27% in the L-NAME group vs. 67% in the control group (p=0.008). Unaugmented mean arterial blood pressure at 24 h from randomization was 86±20 mmHg in the L-NAME group vs. 66±13 mmHg in the control group (p=0.004). Urine output increased at 24 h by 135±78 cc/h in the L-NAME group vs a decrease of 12±87 cc/h in the control group (p<0.001). Time on IABP and time on mechanical ventilation were significantly shorter in the L-NAME group. Conclusions: The results of the present study further support our previous observation that NO synthase inhibitors are beneficial in the treatment of patients with refractory cardiogenic shock.
AB - Aims: To evaluate the effect of L-NAME (a nitric oxide syntahse inhibitor) in the treatment of refractory cardiogenic shock. Methods and results: We enrolled 30 consecutive patients with refractory cardiogenic shock (systolic blood pressure that deteriorated progressively to <100 mmHg during an acute coronary syndrome despite maximal percutaneous coronary revascularization, intra aortic balloon pump, and IV dopamine, furosemide and fluids treatment for at least 1 h, accompanied by signs of peripheral hypoperfusion). Patients were randomized to supportive care alone (n=15, control group) or to supportive care in addition to L-NAME (1 mg/Kg bolus and 1 mg/Kg/h continuous IV drip for 5 h n=15). Death at one month was 27% in the L-NAME group vs. 67% in the control group (p=0.008). Unaugmented mean arterial blood pressure at 24 h from randomization was 86±20 mmHg in the L-NAME group vs. 66±13 mmHg in the control group (p=0.004). Urine output increased at 24 h by 135±78 cc/h in the L-NAME group vs a decrease of 12±87 cc/h in the control group (p<0.001). Time on IABP and time on mechanical ventilation were significantly shorter in the L-NAME group. Conclusions: The results of the present study further support our previous observation that NO synthase inhibitors are beneficial in the treatment of patients with refractory cardiogenic shock.
KW - Cardiogenic Shock
KW - NO synthase inhibitors
KW - Nitric-Oxide
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0042405194&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0195-668X(03)00193-3
DO - 10.1016/S0195-668X(03)00193-3
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:0042405194
SN - 0195-668X
VL - 24
SP - 1287
EP - 1295
JO - European Heart Journal
JF - European Heart Journal
IS - 14
ER -