TY - GEN
T1 - Limitations of highly-available eventually-consistent data stores
AU - Attiya, Hagit
AU - Ellen, Faith
AU - Morrison, Adam
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Copyright 2015 ACM.
PY - 2015/7/21
Y1 - 2015/7/21
N2 - Modern replicated data stores aim to provide high availability, by immediately responding to client requests, often by implementing objects that expose concurrency. Such objects, for example, multi-valued registers (MVRs), do not have sequential specifications. This paper explores a recent model for replicated data stores that can be used to precisely specify causal consistency for such objects, and liveness properties like eventual consistency, without revealing details of the underlying implementation. The model is used to prove the following results: An eventually consistent data store implementing MVRs cannot satisfy a consistency model strictly stronger than observable causal consistency (OCC). OCC is a model somewhat stronger than causal consistency, which captures executions in which client observations can use causality to infer concurrency of operations. This result holds under certain assumptions about the data store. Under the same assumptions, an eventually consistent and causally consistent replicated data store must send messages of unbounded size: If s objects are supported by n replicas, then, for every k > 1, there is an execution in which an (minfn; sgk)-bit message is sent.
AB - Modern replicated data stores aim to provide high availability, by immediately responding to client requests, often by implementing objects that expose concurrency. Such objects, for example, multi-valued registers (MVRs), do not have sequential specifications. This paper explores a recent model for replicated data stores that can be used to precisely specify causal consistency for such objects, and liveness properties like eventual consistency, without revealing details of the underlying implementation. The model is used to prove the following results: An eventually consistent data store implementing MVRs cannot satisfy a consistency model strictly stronger than observable causal consistency (OCC). OCC is a model somewhat stronger than causal consistency, which captures executions in which client observations can use causality to infer concurrency of operations. This result holds under certain assumptions about the data store. Under the same assumptions, an eventually consistent and causally consistent replicated data store must send messages of unbounded size: If s objects are supported by n replicas, then, for every k > 1, there is an execution in which an (minfn; sgk)-bit message is sent.
KW - Causal consistency
KW - Eventual consistency
KW - Replicated data store
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84957667360&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1145/2767386.2767419
DO - 10.1145/2767386.2767419
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontobookanthology.conference???
AN - SCOPUS:84957667360
T3 - Proceedings of the Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing
SP - 385
EP - 394
BT - PODC 2015 - Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing
PB - Association for Computing Machinery
T2 - ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, PODC 2015
Y2 - 21 July 2015 through 23 July 2015
ER -