Abstract
The correlation between governance indices and abnormal returns documented for 1990-1999 subsequently disappeared. The correlation and its disappearance are both due to market participants' gradually learning to appreciate the difference between good-governance and poor-governance firms. Consistent with learning, the correlation's disappearance was associated with increases in market participants' attention to governance; market participants and security analysts were, until the beginning of the 2000s but not subsequently, more positively surprised by the earning announcements of good-governance firms; and, although governance indices no longer generated abnormal returns during the 2000s, their negative association with firm value and operating performance persisted.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 323-348 |
Number of pages | 26 |
Journal | Journal of Financial Economics |
Volume | 108 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - May 2013 |
Keywords
- Analyst forecasts
- Asset pricing
- Behavioral finance
- Corporate governance
- E-Index
- Earning announcements
- Entrenchment
- G-Index
- GIM
- Governance indices
- IRRC provisions
- Learning
- Market efficiency
- Shareholder rights