Laser versus loop electrosurgical excision in vulvar condyloma for eradication of subclinical reservoir demonstrated by assay for 2'-5'oligosynthetase human papillomavirus

A. Schoenfeld, E. Ziv, H. Levavi, Z. Samra, J. Ovadia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We studied, in an open clinical trial, 28 women with giant solitary human papillomavirus (HPV) lesions of the vulva that were treated by both laser and the loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP), and analyzed the biopsy specimens of normal skin adjacent to the lesions for papillomavirus sequencs by Southern blot hybridization and 2’-5’ oligo-A synthetase (interferon) activity. The patients were reexamined after 3 weeks when a second treatment to the still infected areas was reapplied. They were reexamined for recurrence after 3 months: 4 patients harbored HPV-DNA genomes on the laser-treated side, adjacent to the original lesion, compared to 1 patient who developed recurrence on the LEEP side in a more distant, previously untreated, area. The optimal extent of laser or LEEP treatment necessary to reduce recurrence of vulvar condyloma remains to be established. Good in situ hybridization tests combined with the polymerase chain reaction and measurements of oligosynthetase activity to determine the types of cells involved at different sites of infection and to assess harboring of latent HPV genomes in histologically normal tissue are necessary in order to plan proper HPV treatment modality strategies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)46-51
Number of pages6
JournalGynecologic and Obstetric Investigation
Volume40
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1995

Keywords

  • Human papillomavirus DNA
  • Laser
  • Loop electrosurgical excision procedure
  • Oligosynthetase
  • Vulva

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Laser versus loop electrosurgical excision in vulvar condyloma for eradication of subclinical reservoir demonstrated by assay for 2'-5'oligosynthetase human papillomavirus'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this