TY - JOUR
T1 - Laparoscopy during pregnancy
T2 - a literature review.
AU - Nezhat, F. R.
AU - Tazuke, S.
AU - Nezhat, C. H.
AU - Seidman, D. S.
AU - Phillips, D. R.
AU - Nezhat, C. R.
PY - 1997
Y1 - 1997
N2 - OBJECTIVE: To review the literature regarding the role of laparoscopy during pregnancy, particularly adnexal mass and non-obstetric surgery, incorporating the results of a series of 9 cases of laparoscopy during pregnancy at our centers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Medline search was performed to review the literature, and the reference lists provided by those articles were further explored for citations regarding laparoscopic adnexal surgery, appendectomy, and cholecystectomy. Our series of 9 patients consisted of pregnant patients with adnexal mass or acute abdomen who would otherwise have undergone exploratory laparotomy. Follow-up data for these 9 cases were collected by office visits, inquiry to the primary referring physicians, and telephone calls to the patient. RESULTS: The literature search yielded 42 additional cases of operative pelvic laparoscopy and 51 cases of abdominal operative laparoscopy (cholecystectomy and appendectomy). The publications, particularly regarding cholecystectomy, were supportive of the laparoscopic approach during pregnancy. All of the patients in our series had favorable outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Advanced operative laparoscopy has been successfully performed for certain indications during pregnancy.
AB - OBJECTIVE: To review the literature regarding the role of laparoscopy during pregnancy, particularly adnexal mass and non-obstetric surgery, incorporating the results of a series of 9 cases of laparoscopy during pregnancy at our centers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Medline search was performed to review the literature, and the reference lists provided by those articles were further explored for citations regarding laparoscopic adnexal surgery, appendectomy, and cholecystectomy. Our series of 9 patients consisted of pregnant patients with adnexal mass or acute abdomen who would otherwise have undergone exploratory laparotomy. Follow-up data for these 9 cases were collected by office visits, inquiry to the primary referring physicians, and telephone calls to the patient. RESULTS: The literature search yielded 42 additional cases of operative pelvic laparoscopy and 51 cases of abdominal operative laparoscopy (cholecystectomy and appendectomy). The publications, particularly regarding cholecystectomy, were supportive of the laparoscopic approach during pregnancy. All of the patients in our series had favorable outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Advanced operative laparoscopy has been successfully performed for certain indications during pregnancy.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030621784&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.systematicreview???
C2 - 9876642
AN - SCOPUS:0030621784
VL - 1
SP - 17
EP - 27
JO - Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
JF - Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
SN - 1086-8089
IS - 1
ER -