TY - JOUR
T1 - Laparoscopic management of suspected postpartum uterine rupture
T2 - a novel approach
AU - Segal, Roy
AU - Levin, Ishai
AU - Many, Ariel
AU - Michaan, Nadav
AU - Laskov, Ido
AU - Amikam, Uri
AU - Yogev, Yariv
AU - Cohen, Aviad
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Background: Exploratory laparotomy is considered the gold standard treatment for women with suspected uterine rupture. We aimed to investigate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopy as an alternative for laparotomy for the management of hemodynamically stable women with suspected postpartum uterine rupture. Study design: We conducted a case series study including all women who were diagnosed with postpartum uterine rupture following vaginal delivery in a university-affiliated tertiary hospital, between November 2012 and July 2021. Until 2016, all women with suspected post-partum uterine rupture underwent laparotomy. Following 2016, a new tailored protocol based on laparoscopy for the management of postpartum uterine rupture in hemodynamically stable women was implemented. A comparison was made between women who underwent emergent laparoscopy to laparotomy. Results: During the study period 17 women were diagnosed with postpartum uterine rupture. From January 2012 to January 2016, four cases of uterine rupture were diagnosed, all of whom underwent laparotomy. Since 2016, thirteen cases of uterine rupture were diagnosed, of whom seven women (54%) underwent laparoscopy and 6 (46%) laparotomy. The median time interval from delivery to surgery was 70.5 min IQR (40–179) in the laparotomy group and 202 min IQR (70–485) in the laparoscopy group. The median operative time for laparoscopic surgery was 80 min (IQR 60–114) and 78 min (IQR 58–114) for the laparotomy group. Four women who underwent laparotomy (40%) and one who underwent laparoscopy (14.2%) were admitted to the intensive care unit following surgery. Blood products transfusion was required in six women who had laparotomy (60%) and one who had laparoscopy (14.2%). Median hospitalization period was 5 d IQR (4–5) in the laparotomy group as compared to 3 d IQR (3–4) in the laparoscopy group. There were no conversions to laparotomy in the laparoscopy group. Conclusions: In hemodynamic stable women laparoscopic surgery for suspected postpartum uterine rupture is feasible and safe.
AB - Background: Exploratory laparotomy is considered the gold standard treatment for women with suspected uterine rupture. We aimed to investigate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopy as an alternative for laparotomy for the management of hemodynamically stable women with suspected postpartum uterine rupture. Study design: We conducted a case series study including all women who were diagnosed with postpartum uterine rupture following vaginal delivery in a university-affiliated tertiary hospital, between November 2012 and July 2021. Until 2016, all women with suspected post-partum uterine rupture underwent laparotomy. Following 2016, a new tailored protocol based on laparoscopy for the management of postpartum uterine rupture in hemodynamically stable women was implemented. A comparison was made between women who underwent emergent laparoscopy to laparotomy. Results: During the study period 17 women were diagnosed with postpartum uterine rupture. From January 2012 to January 2016, four cases of uterine rupture were diagnosed, all of whom underwent laparotomy. Since 2016, thirteen cases of uterine rupture were diagnosed, of whom seven women (54%) underwent laparoscopy and 6 (46%) laparotomy. The median time interval from delivery to surgery was 70.5 min IQR (40–179) in the laparotomy group and 202 min IQR (70–485) in the laparoscopy group. The median operative time for laparoscopic surgery was 80 min (IQR 60–114) and 78 min (IQR 58–114) for the laparotomy group. Four women who underwent laparotomy (40%) and one who underwent laparoscopy (14.2%) were admitted to the intensive care unit following surgery. Blood products transfusion was required in six women who had laparotomy (60%) and one who had laparoscopy (14.2%). Median hospitalization period was 5 d IQR (4–5) in the laparotomy group as compared to 3 d IQR (3–4) in the laparoscopy group. There were no conversions to laparotomy in the laparoscopy group. Conclusions: In hemodynamic stable women laparoscopic surgery for suspected postpartum uterine rupture is feasible and safe.
KW - Postpartum
KW - laparoscopy
KW - uterine rupture
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85124239019&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/14767058.2022.2033721
DO - 10.1080/14767058.2022.2033721
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 35105254
AN - SCOPUS:85124239019
SN - 1476-7058
VL - 35
SP - 9362
EP - 9367
JO - Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine
JF - Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine
IS - 25
ER -