TY - CHAP
T1 - Language change, prescriptive language, and spontaneous speech in Modern Hebrew
T2 - a corpus-based study of early recordings
AU - Gonen, Einat
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Unlike most living languages, the use of Hebrew as a spoken language is characterized by historical discontinuity. In this article, I discuss certain features of spoken usage among the first generations of speakers of Modern Hebrew (henceforth: MH), using a unique corpus – ten hours of unstructured interviews recorded in 1956–1966 with speakers born between 1885–1925. Using these recordings, I suggest a distinction between two types of language change:Dynamic organic language change evident from the comparison between two stages of a spoken language.Disparity between the planned prescriptive language and the spoken language used from the first few decades of MH (henceforth: Early Modern Hebrew – EMH) through the present.This analysis sheds light on linguistic processes reflected in present-day Hebrew, as it allows us to distinguish between the two types of changes. My proposal is that dynamic language changes occurred in MH only when there is a language change among different generations of MH speakers. This type of changes is similar to the common linguistic changes of any other normal living language. By contrast, the second type of a change is the linguistic differences between MH and prescriptive language (which is based on Classical Hebrew) that do not reflect a process of normal language change, but a partial adoption (along with partial rejection) of the prescriptive language already by the first generations of speakers.
AB - Unlike most living languages, the use of Hebrew as a spoken language is characterized by historical discontinuity. In this article, I discuss certain features of spoken usage among the first generations of speakers of Modern Hebrew (henceforth: MH), using a unique corpus – ten hours of unstructured interviews recorded in 1956–1966 with speakers born between 1885–1925. Using these recordings, I suggest a distinction between two types of language change:Dynamic organic language change evident from the comparison between two stages of a spoken language.Disparity between the planned prescriptive language and the spoken language used from the first few decades of MH (henceforth: Early Modern Hebrew – EMH) through the present.This analysis sheds light on linguistic processes reflected in present-day Hebrew, as it allows us to distinguish between the two types of changes. My proposal is that dynamic language changes occurred in MH only when there is a language change among different generations of MH speakers. This type of changes is similar to the common linguistic changes of any other normal living language. By contrast, the second type of a change is the linguistic differences between MH and prescriptive language (which is based on Classical Hebrew) that do not reflect a process of normal language change, but a partial adoption (along with partial rejection) of the prescriptive language already by the first generations of speakers.
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontobookanthology.chapter???
SN - 9789027203274
T3 - Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today Ser
SP - 201
EP - 220
BT - Language Contact, Continuity and Change in the Genesis of Modern Hebrew
A2 - Doron, Edit
A2 - Rappaport Hovav, Malka
A2 - Reshef , Yael
A2 - Taube, Moshe
PB - John Benjamins Publishing Company
CY - Amsterdam ; Philadelphia
ER -