Lamarckism and the Emergence of ‘Scientific’ Social Sciences in Nineteenth-Century Britain and France

Snait B. Gissis*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

The book presents an original synthesizing framework on the relations between ‘the biological’ and ‘the social’. Within these relations, the late nineteenth-century emergence of social sciences aspiring to be constituted as autonomous, as 'scientific' disciplines, is described, analyzed and explained. Through this framework, the author points to conceptual and constructive commonalities conjoining significant founding figures – Lamarck, Spencer, Hughlings Jackson, Ribot, Durkheim, Freud – who were not grouped nor analyzed in this manner before. Thus, the book offers a rather unique synthesis of the interactions of the social, the mental, and the evolutionary biological – Spencerian Lamarckism and/or Neo-Lamarckism – crystallizing into novel fields. It adds substantially to the understanding of the complexities of evolutionary debates during the last quarter of the nineteenth century. It will attract the attention of a wide spectrum of specialists, academics, and postgraduates in European history of the nineteenth century, history and philosophy of science, and history of biology and of the social sciences, including psychology.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationHistory, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media B.V.
Pages1-307
Number of pages307
DOIs
StatePublished - 2024

Publication series

NameHistory, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences
Volume36
ISSN (Print)2211-1948
ISSN (Electronic)2211-1956

Keywords

  • British sociology
  • Collectivity
  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Individuals
  • Neo-Lamarckism
  • Plasticity
  • Scientific psychology
  • Scientific sociology
  • Spencerian Lamarckism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Lamarckism and the Emergence of ‘Scientific’ Social Sciences in Nineteenth-Century Britain and France'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this