TY - JOUR
T1 - Label-Free Quantitative Imaging of Sperm for In-Vitro Fertilization Using Interferometric Phase Microscopy
AU - Mirsky, Simcha K.
AU - Barnea, Itay
AU - Shaked, Natan Tzvi
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Accurate morphological evaluation via imaging of sperm cells is a critical step in both routine sperm analysis and sperm cell selection for in-vitro fertilization. In this paper, we review the significant advantages of interferometric phase microscopy (IPM), also called digital holographic microscopy, for label-free sperm imaging in fertility clinics. We first review the current state of the art of label-free sperm cell imaging for in-vitro fertilization, including bright-field, Zernike phase contrast, differential interference contrast (DIC), Hoffman modulation contrast and polarized light microscopy, as well as intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection (IMSI). Using experimental demonstrations, we compare the limitations of these techniques for label-free sperm imaging. IPM and its advantages are then discussed in detail. These include the ability to receive quantitative data regarding the 3D structure of sperm cells, as well as data concerning sperm biomass and morphology without labeling. The current gap to clinical use is discussed, as well as the possible solution of employing compact and simple holographic modules, which may allow holographic imaging to reach the clinic in the near future.
AB - Accurate morphological evaluation via imaging of sperm cells is a critical step in both routine sperm analysis and sperm cell selection for in-vitro fertilization. In this paper, we review the significant advantages of interferometric phase microscopy (IPM), also called digital holographic microscopy, for label-free sperm imaging in fertility clinics. We first review the current state of the art of label-free sperm cell imaging for in-vitro fertilization, including bright-field, Zernike phase contrast, differential interference contrast (DIC), Hoffman modulation contrast and polarized light microscopy, as well as intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection (IMSI). Using experimental demonstrations, we compare the limitations of these techniques for label-free sperm imaging. IPM and its advantages are then discussed in detail. These include the ability to receive quantitative data regarding the 3D structure of sperm cells, as well as data concerning sperm biomass and morphology without labeling. The current gap to clinical use is discussed, as well as the possible solution of employing compact and simple holographic modules, which may allow holographic imaging to reach the clinic in the near future.
U2 - 10.4172/2375-4508.1000190
DO - 10.4172/2375-4508.1000190
M3 - Article
JO - F-Wor dl w di e ISSN: 2375-4508 Mirsky et al., JFIV Reprod Med Genet 2016, 4:3 DOI: 10.4172/2375-4508.1000190 Review Article Journal of Fertilization: In Vitro - IVF-Worldwide, Reproductive Medicine, Genetics & Stem Cell Biology
JF - F-Wor dl w di e ISSN: 2375-4508 Mirsky et al., JFIV Reprod Med Genet 2016, 4:3 DOI: 10.4172/2375-4508.1000190 Review Article Journal of Fertilization: In Vitro - IVF-Worldwide, Reproductive Medicine, Genetics & Stem Cell Biology
SN - 2375-4508
ER -