Judicial Politics and Sentencing Decisions

Alma Cohen, Crystal Yang

Research output: Working paper / PreprintWorking paper

Abstract

This paper investigates whether judge political affiliation contributes to racial and gender disparities in sentencing using data on over 500,000 federal defendants linked to sentencing judge. Exploiting random case assignment, we find that Republican-appointed judges sentence black defendants to 3.0 more months than similar non-blacks and female defendants to 2.0 fewer months than similar males compared to Democratic-appointed judges, 65 percent of the baseline racial sentence gap and 17 percent of the baseline gender sentence gap, respectively. These differences cannot be explained by other judge characteristics and grow substantially larger when judges are granted more discretion.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationCambridge, Mass
PublisherNational Bureau of Economic Research
Number of pages41
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2018
Externally publishedYes

Publication series

NameNBER working paper series
PublisherNational Bureau of Economic Research
No.24615

ULI Keywords

  • uli

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Judicial Politics and Sentencing Decisions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this