Is There an Alternative “Advanced Maternal Age” Threshold for Recommendation of Invasive Prenatal Testing?

Idit Maya, Liat Salzer Sheelo, Dana Brabbing-Goldstein, Reut Matar, Sarit Kahana, Ifaat Agmon-Fishman, Cochava Klein, Merav Gurevitch, Lina Basel-Salmon, Lena Sagi-Dain*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This retrospective cohort study aimed to examine the appropriate maternal age threshold for recommendation of invasive prenatal testing. We calculated the rate of clinically significant microarray findings in pregnancies with normal fetal ultrasound per each year of maternal age, to estimate the optimal cut-off. Of the 7033 prenatal microarray analyses, 108 (1.53%) clinically significant results were noted. Receiver operating characteristics analysis failed to define a specific maternal age cut-off, in the overall cohort as well following the omission of non-invasive prenatal screening-detectable common autosomal trisomies. This implies that each woman should be offered the possibility of invasive testing, preferably publicly funded.

Original languageEnglish
Article number102821
JournalJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada
Volume47
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2025

Keywords

  • chromosomal microarray analysis
  • copy number variants
  • invasive testing
  • maternal age

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is There an Alternative “Advanced Maternal Age” Threshold for Recommendation of Invasive Prenatal Testing?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this