Is PET/CT essential in the diagnosis and follow-up of temporal arteritis?

Carlo Salvarani*, Alessandra Soriano, Francesco Muratore, Yehuda Shoenfeld, Daniel Blockmans

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

34 Scopus citations

Abstract

The increasing availability and improvement of imaging techniques are deeply influencing diagnosis and work-up of patients affected with vasculitis, particularly those with large vessel vasculitis (LVV). Fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET), especially when integrated with computed tomography (CT), is taking hold as a useful diagnostic technique to examine the aorta and the other large vessels in giant cell arteritis (GCA) with concomitant large vessel involvement (LV-GCA). In this paper we examined the progresses performed in this field in the last twenty years and the evidence available so far according to two different points of view (‘pros’ and ‘cons’), in order to give a comprehensive answer to a still open question about the role of PET/CT in the diagnosis and follow-up of GCA.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1125-1130
Number of pages6
JournalAutoimmunity Reviews
Volume16
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2017

Keywords

  • CT
  • Computed tomography
  • F-FDG
  • Fluorodeoxyglucose
  • Giant cell arteritis (GCA)
  • Imaging
  • Large vessel vasculitis
  • PET
  • Positron emission tomography
  • Temporal artery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is PET/CT essential in the diagnosis and follow-up of temporal arteritis?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this