Is it necessary to induce labor in cases of intrauterine growth restriction at term ?

Tal Shavit, Eran Ashual, Rivka Regev, Dana Sadeh, Moshe D. Fejgin, Tal Biron-Shental*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: Infants with intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) have increased morbidity and mortality. The decision whether to induce labor at term or to expectantly manage these pregnancies is controversial. The aim of this study was to assess the outcomes of these two management strategies in term pregnancies. Study design: This retrospective cohort study compared neonatal and maternal morbidity and mortality of IUGR fetuses (estimated fetal weight below the 10 th percentile) between induced and spontaneous labors. Results: Records of 669 IUGR newborns were reviewed; 499 were delivered through spontaneous labor and 170 were delivered through induced labor. Epidemiology and early perinatal outcomes between the two groups were similar. The cesarean section rate was significantly higher (P < 0.005) in the induced group. Conclusions: Expectant management for term IUGR pregnancies seems to be safe, with lower rates of cesarean deliveries. A large, prospective, randomized controlled trial with long-term neonatal follow-up is indicated .

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)539-543
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Perinatal Medicine
Volume40
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2012

Keywords

  • Induction of labor
  • Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR)
  • Term pregnancy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is it necessary to induce labor in cases of intrauterine growth restriction at term ?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this