TY - JOUR
T1 - Invited commentary
T2 - Opportunities that come with studying the co-occurrence of multiple outcomes
AU - Haneuse, Sebastien
AU - Schrag, Deborah
AU - Nevo, Daniel
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: [email protected].
PY - 2020/9/1
Y1 - 2020/9/1
N2 - In almost all clinical settings, patients are at risk for multiple potential events and, in consultation with healthcare providers, must weigh the potential benefits and harms across these events when making decisions. As researchers seek to build an evidence base to inform these decisions, they must contend with a choice as to how they will handle the different events. One approach, arguably the standard approach in the literature, is to consider the events individually by conducting analyses and publishing results for each one at a time. Doing so, however, fails to acknowledge or exploit the inherent multivariate nature of the data, represents a lost opportunity, and results in an evidence base that is not aligned with how clinical decision-making is actually performed. The article by Prentice et al. (Am J Epidemiol. 2020;189(9):972-981) in this issue of the Journal moves beyond this standard by illustrating recently developed methods that directly take advantage of information on the co-occurrence of multiple events. Moreover, their article highlights the role of modern methods in deriving additional information and insight from studies of multiple clinical outcomes by making full use of multivariate data, with the goal being to complement, not replace, existing methods.
AB - In almost all clinical settings, patients are at risk for multiple potential events and, in consultation with healthcare providers, must weigh the potential benefits and harms across these events when making decisions. As researchers seek to build an evidence base to inform these decisions, they must contend with a choice as to how they will handle the different events. One approach, arguably the standard approach in the literature, is to consider the events individually by conducting analyses and publishing results for each one at a time. Doing so, however, fails to acknowledge or exploit the inherent multivariate nature of the data, represents a lost opportunity, and results in an evidence base that is not aligned with how clinical decision-making is actually performed. The article by Prentice et al. (Am J Epidemiol. 2020;189(9):972-981) in this issue of the Journal moves beyond this standard by illustrating recently developed methods that directly take advantage of information on the co-occurrence of multiple events. Moreover, their article highlights the role of modern methods in deriving additional information and insight from studies of multiple clinical outcomes by making full use of multivariate data, with the goal being to complement, not replace, existing methods.
KW - Decision-making
KW - Multivariate data analysis
KW - Semicompeting risks
KW - Time-to-event data
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85089796690&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/aje/kwaa031
DO - 10.1093/aje/kwaa031
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.systematicreview???
C2 - 32314782
AN - SCOPUS:85089796690
SN - 0002-9262
VL - 189
SP - 982
EP - 984
JO - American Journal of Epidemiology
JF - American Journal of Epidemiology
IS - 9
ER -