TY - JOUR
T1 - Intuitive rules in science and mathematics
T2 - The case of ‘more of a — more of b’
AU - Stavy, Ruth
AU - Tirosh, Dina
PY - 1996/9
Y1 - 1996/9
N2 - In the last twenty years researchers have studied students’ mathematical and scientific conceptions and reasoning. Most of this research is content-specific. It has been found that students often hold ideas that are not in line with accepted scientific notions. In our joint work in mathematics and science education it became apparent that many of these alternative conceptions hail from the same intuitive rules. We have so far identified two such rules: ‘The more of A, the more of B’ and, ‘Everything can be divided by two’. The first rule is reflected in students’ responses to many tasks, including all classical Piagetian conservation tasks (conservation of number, area, weight, volume, matter, etc.), in all tasks related to intensive quantities (density, temperature, concentration, etc.), and in tasks related to infinite quantities. The second rule is observed in responses related to successive division of material and geometrical objects, and in successive dilution tasks. In this paper we describe and discuss the first rule and its relevance to science and mathematics education. In a second paper (Tirosh and Stavy, in press) we shall describe and discuss the second rule.
AB - In the last twenty years researchers have studied students’ mathematical and scientific conceptions and reasoning. Most of this research is content-specific. It has been found that students often hold ideas that are not in line with accepted scientific notions. In our joint work in mathematics and science education it became apparent that many of these alternative conceptions hail from the same intuitive rules. We have so far identified two such rules: ‘The more of A, the more of B’ and, ‘Everything can be divided by two’. The first rule is reflected in students’ responses to many tasks, including all classical Piagetian conservation tasks (conservation of number, area, weight, volume, matter, etc.), in all tasks related to intensive quantities (density, temperature, concentration, etc.), and in tasks related to infinite quantities. The second rule is observed in responses related to successive division of material and geometrical objects, and in successive dilution tasks. In this paper we describe and discuss the first rule and its relevance to science and mathematics education. In a second paper (Tirosh and Stavy, in press) we shall describe and discuss the second rule.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=26244457830&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/0950069960180602
DO - 10.1080/0950069960180602
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:26244457830
SN - 0950-0693
VL - 18
SP - 653
EP - 667
JO - International Journal of Science Education
JF - International Journal of Science Education
IS - 6
ER -