Intrinsic and environmental drivers of pairwise cohesion in wild Canis social groups

John F. Benson*, David A. Keiter, Peter J. Mahoney, Benjamin L. Allen, Lee Allen, Francisco Álvares, Morgan L. Anderson, Shannon M. Barber-Meyer, Adi Barocas, James C. Beasley, Linda Behrendorff, Jerrold L. Belant, Dean E. Beyer, Luigi Boitani, Bridget L. Borg, Stan Boutin, Erin E. Boydston, Justin L. Brown, Joseph K. Bump, Jonathon D. CepekMichael J. Chamberlain, Yvette M. Chenaux-Ibrahim, Seth G. Cherry, Duško Ćirović, Paolo Ciucci, H. Dean Cluff, Susan M. Cooper, Kevin R. Crooks, Daniel L.J. Dupont, Robert N. Fisher, Daniel Fortin, Thomas D. Gable, Emilio García, Eli Geffen, Stanley D. Gehrt, Michael Gillingham, Douglas C. Heard, Mark Hebblewhite, Joseph W. Hinton, Austin T. Homkes, Chris G. Howden, Djuro Huber, Pat J. Jackson, Kyle Joly, Allicia Kelly, Marcella J. Kelly, Katrien A. Kingdon, Abhijeet Kulkarni, Josip Kusak, Gerald W. Kuzyk, Bryce C. Lake, Luis Llaneza, José Vicente López-Bao, Daniel R. MacNulty, Ashley A.D. McLaren, Philip D. McLoughlin, Evelyn H. Merrill, Kenneth J. Mills, Numi Mitchell, Seth A. Moore, Matthew A. Mumma, Maureen H. Murray, Marco Musiani, Mónia Nakamura, Eric W. Neilson, Lalenia M. Neufeld, Thomas M. Newsome, John K. Oakleaf, Vicente Palacios, Marlo M. Perdicas, Thomas Perry, Tyler R. Petroelje, Cyrenea B. Piper, Christina M. Prokopenko, Laura R. Prugh, Seth P.D. Riley, Helena Rio-Maior, Gretchen H. Roffler, Dale Rollins, Håkan Sand, Fiona K.A. Schmiegelow, Dale R. Seip, Mathew S. Sorum, Colleen C. St. Clair, Robin Steenweg, Michael W. Strohbach, Jack Tatler, Maria Thaker, Connor A. Thompson, Julie W. Turner, Abi T. Vanak, Eric Vander Wal, Petter Wabakken, Scott E. Walter, Sarah C. Webster, Tyler J. Wheeldon, Camilla Wikenros, Steve K. Windels, Julie K. Young, Sana Zabihi-Seissan, Barbara Zimmermann, Brent R. Patterson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Animals within social groups respond to costs and benefits of sociality by adjusting the proportion of time they spend in close proximity to other individuals in the group (cohesion). Variation in cohesion between individuals, in turn, shapes important group-level processes such as subgroup formation and fission–fusion dynamics. Although critical to animal sociality, a comprehensive understanding of the factors influencing cohesion remains a gap in our knowledge of cooperative behavior in animals. We tracked 574 individuals from six species within the genus Canis in 15 countries on four continents with GPS telemetry to estimate the time that pairs of individuals within social groups spent in close proximity and test hypotheses regarding drivers of cohesion. Pairs of social canids (Canis spp.) varied widely in the proportion of time they spent together (5%–100%) during seasonal monitoring periods relative to both intrinsic characteristics and environmental conditions. The majority of our data came from three species of wolves (gray wolves, eastern wolves, and red wolves) and coyotes. For these species, cohesion within social groups was greatest between breeding pairs and varied seasonally as the nature of cooperative activities changed relative to annual life history patterns. Across species, wolves were more cohesive than coyotes. For wolves, pairs were less cohesive in larger groups, and when suitable, small prey was present reflecting the constraints of food resources and intragroup competition on social associations. Pair cohesion in wolves declined with increased anthropogenic modification of the landscape and greater climatic variability, underscoring challenges for conserving social top predators in a changing world. We show that pairwise cohesion in social groups varies strongly both within and across Canis species, as individuals respond to changing ecological context defined by resources, competition, and anthropogenic disturbance. Our work highlights that cohesion is a highly plastic component of animal sociality that holds significant promise for elucidating ecological and evolutionary mechanisms underlying cooperative behavior.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere4492
JournalEcology
Volume106
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2025

Funding

FundersFunder number
Albert Ellis Institute
National Biodiversity Future Center-NBFC
Bernd Thies Foundation, UK Wolf Conservation Trust
School of Natural Resources at the University of Nebraska‐Lincoln
Michigan Department of Natural Resources
Max McGraw Wildlife Foundation
John Downer Productions Ltd.
National Geographic Society
Silverback Films Ltd.
Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources
Associação para a Conservação do Habitat do Lobo Ibérico
National Recovery and Resilience Plan
FEDER EU
US Fish and Wildlife Pittman Robertson Funds
Wildlife Conservation Society
Rolling Plains Quail Research Foundation
Ministère des Forêts, de la Faune et des Parcs
State of Alaska General Funds
Plimsoll Productions Ltd.
Safari Club International Michigan Involvement Committee
Natural Resources and Northern Development Manitoba
Minnesota Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund
Washington Department of Natural Resources
Gas Research and Innovation Society
Abruzzo Lazio and Molise National Park Authority
Government of Nunavut
School of Natural Resources at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Alberta Ecotrust, Canadian Wildlife Federation
University of Georgia Research Foundation
U.S. Geological Survey
Manitoba Hydro
Indian Space Research Organisation
Croatian Environment Fund
Gulo Film Productions Ltd.
Safari Club International Foundation
European Commission
British Broadcasting Corporation
Wellcome Trust
Nevada Department of Wildlife $3 Predator Fee Program
Forest Enhancement Society of British Columbia
Parks Canada
EuroNatur Stiftung
Habitat Conservation Trust Foundation
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Ministry of Forests, Lands, Natural Resource Operations and Rural Development
Voyaguers National Park
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Utah Division of Wildlife Resources
University of Northern British Columbia
National Park Service
Xunta de Galicia
Utah Agricultural Experiment Station
Croatian Agency for Nature and Environment
Manitoba Fish and Wildlife Fund
Nature and Parks Authority of Israel
John Prince Research Forest
USFWS Red Wolf Recovery Program
Prince Charitable Trusts
Ministerio de Asuntos Económicos y Transformación Digital, Gobierno de EspañaCGL2017-87528-R, RYC‐2015‐18932
National Biodiversity Future Center‐NBFC00000033
Wellcome Trust DBT India AllianceIA/CPHI/15/1/502028
Iviq Hunters and Trappers AssociationW-147-R
National Science FoundationDEB‐1748625, DEB‐1652420
U.S. Department of EnergyDE‐EM0005228
Alberta Environment and Parks2038704, 1556248
Ministarstvo Prosvete, Nauke i Tehnološkog Razvoja451‐03‐68/2022‐14/200178
Regional Government of AsturiasIDI/2021/000075
Rhode Island Department of Environmental ManagementF17AF01143
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia14.30, SFRH/BD/144087/2019

    Keywords

    • Canis
    • animal sociality
    • cohesion
    • cooperative behavior
    • coyotes
    • group size
    • human footprint
    • wolves

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Intrinsic and environmental drivers of pairwise cohesion in wild Canis social groups'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this