TY - JOUR
T1 - Intravitreal air bubbles following intravitreal injections
T2 - a comprehensive analysis
AU - Krauthammer, Mark
AU - Trabelsi, Etty
AU - Moisseiev, Elad
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2021/12
Y1 - 2021/12
N2 - Purpose: To evaluate the prevalence of residual air bubbles following intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF agents, and to compare two techniques designed to reduce their occurrence. Methods: Patients who received intravitreal injections reported the presence of air bubbles following the procedure, and were followed to determine when they disappeared. Two techniques used to reduce air bubbles prior to injection were compared—tapping the syringe with the needle up (“upwards” technique) or down (“downwards” technique). Rates of residual air bubbles were compared between techniques, and between different drugs. Results: The study included 344 intravitreal injections, 172 injected with each technique. The overall rate of residual air bubbles was 11.3%, with 94.9% resolution by 48 h. The rate was significantly lower with the “downwards” technique (7.5% vs. 15.1%, p = 0.027). It was also significantly lower with ranibizumab injected using pre-filled syringes than with bevacizumab and aflibercept (0% vs. 12.1% and 14.7%, p < 0.0001). A questionnaire revealed patients reported medium levels of discomfort and a high importance of avoiding air bubbles. Conclusions: Residual air bubbles are a common occurrence, likely to be experienced by most patients undergoing repeated injections. This phenomenon may be significantly reduced by using the described “downwards” technique, or pre-filled syringes. [Figure not available: see fulltext.]
AB - Purpose: To evaluate the prevalence of residual air bubbles following intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF agents, and to compare two techniques designed to reduce their occurrence. Methods: Patients who received intravitreal injections reported the presence of air bubbles following the procedure, and were followed to determine when they disappeared. Two techniques used to reduce air bubbles prior to injection were compared—tapping the syringe with the needle up (“upwards” technique) or down (“downwards” technique). Rates of residual air bubbles were compared between techniques, and between different drugs. Results: The study included 344 intravitreal injections, 172 injected with each technique. The overall rate of residual air bubbles was 11.3%, with 94.9% resolution by 48 h. The rate was significantly lower with the “downwards” technique (7.5% vs. 15.1%, p = 0.027). It was also significantly lower with ranibizumab injected using pre-filled syringes than with bevacizumab and aflibercept (0% vs. 12.1% and 14.7%, p < 0.0001). A questionnaire revealed patients reported medium levels of discomfort and a high importance of avoiding air bubbles. Conclusions: Residual air bubbles are a common occurrence, likely to be experienced by most patients undergoing repeated injections. This phenomenon may be significantly reduced by using the described “downwards” technique, or pre-filled syringes. [Figure not available: see fulltext.]
KW - Air bubbles
KW - Anti-VEGF
KW - Intravitreal injection
KW - Syringe preparation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85110063173&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00417-021-05302-0
DO - 10.1007/s00417-021-05302-0
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 34258656
AN - SCOPUS:85110063173
SN - 0721-832X
VL - 259
SP - 3697
EP - 3702
JO - Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
JF - Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
IS - 12
ER -