TY - JOUR
T1 - Intravenous Versus Oral Iron Supplementation for the Treatment of Anemia in CKD
T2 - Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
AU - Rozen-Zvi, Benaya
AU - Gafter-Gvili, Anat
AU - Paul, Mical
AU - Leibovici, Leonard
AU - Shpilberg, Ofer
AU - Gafter, Uzi
PY - 2008/11
Y1 - 2008/11
N2 - Background: Iron supplementation is essential for the treatment of patients with anemia of chronic kidney disease (CKD). It is not clear which is the best method of iron administration. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. A search was performed until January 2008 of MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, conference proceedings in nephrology, and reference lists of included trials. Setting & Population: Patients with CKD (stages III to V). We included dialysis patients and patients with CKD not on dialysis therapy (hereafter referred to as patients with CKD). Selection Criteria for Studies: We included all randomized controlled trials regardless of publication status or language. Intervention: Intravenous (IV) versus oral iron supplementation. Outcomes Measures: Primary outcomes assessed: absolute hemoglobin (Hb) level or change in Hb level from baseline. We also assessed all-cause mortality, erythropoiesis-stimulating agent requirement, adverse events, ferritin level, and need for renal replacement therapy in patients with CKD. Results: 13 trials were identified, 6 including patients with CKD and 7 including dialysis patients. Compared with oral iron, there was a significantly greater Hb level in dialysis patients treated with IV iron (weighted mean difference, 0.83 g/dL; 95% confidence interval, 0.09 to 1.57). Meta-regression showed a positive association between Hb level increase and IV iron dose administered and a negative association with baseline Hb level. For patients with CKD, there was a small but significant difference in Hb level favoring the IV iron group (weighted mean difference, 0. 31 g/dL; 95% confidence interval, 0.09 to 0. 53). Data for all-cause mortality were sparse, and there was no difference in adverse events between the IV- and oral-treated patients. Limitations: There was significant heterogeneity between trials. Follow-up was limited to 2 to 3 months. Conclusions: Our review shows that patients on hemodialysis therapy have better Hb level response when treated with IV iron. For patients with CKD, this effect is small.
AB - Background: Iron supplementation is essential for the treatment of patients with anemia of chronic kidney disease (CKD). It is not clear which is the best method of iron administration. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. A search was performed until January 2008 of MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, conference proceedings in nephrology, and reference lists of included trials. Setting & Population: Patients with CKD (stages III to V). We included dialysis patients and patients with CKD not on dialysis therapy (hereafter referred to as patients with CKD). Selection Criteria for Studies: We included all randomized controlled trials regardless of publication status or language. Intervention: Intravenous (IV) versus oral iron supplementation. Outcomes Measures: Primary outcomes assessed: absolute hemoglobin (Hb) level or change in Hb level from baseline. We also assessed all-cause mortality, erythropoiesis-stimulating agent requirement, adverse events, ferritin level, and need for renal replacement therapy in patients with CKD. Results: 13 trials were identified, 6 including patients with CKD and 7 including dialysis patients. Compared with oral iron, there was a significantly greater Hb level in dialysis patients treated with IV iron (weighted mean difference, 0.83 g/dL; 95% confidence interval, 0.09 to 1.57). Meta-regression showed a positive association between Hb level increase and IV iron dose administered and a negative association with baseline Hb level. For patients with CKD, there was a small but significant difference in Hb level favoring the IV iron group (weighted mean difference, 0. 31 g/dL; 95% confidence interval, 0.09 to 0. 53). Data for all-cause mortality were sparse, and there was no difference in adverse events between the IV- and oral-treated patients. Limitations: There was significant heterogeneity between trials. Follow-up was limited to 2 to 3 months. Conclusions: Our review shows that patients on hemodialysis therapy have better Hb level response when treated with IV iron. For patients with CKD, this effect is small.
KW - Anemia
KW - chronic kidney disease
KW - hemodialysis
KW - hemoglobin
KW - iron
KW - meta-analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=54349090164&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.05.033
DO - 10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.05.033
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:54349090164
SN - 0272-6386
VL - 52
SP - 897
EP - 906
JO - American Journal of Kidney Diseases
JF - American Journal of Kidney Diseases
IS - 5
ER -