TY - JOUR
T1 - Interventional cardiology in Israel at 2005 - State of practice
AU - Kaluski, Edo
AU - Uriel, Nir
AU - Hendler, Alberto
AU - Kornowski, Ran
AU - Krakover, Ricardo
AU - Mosseri, Morris
PY - 2007
Y1 - 2007
N2 - Objective: To assess the current practice of interventional cardiology in Israel. Method: Under the auspices of the 'Working group of interventional cardiology' of the 'Israel Heart Society,' a questionnaire regarding the practice of interventional cardiology sent to directors of interventional cardiology in all public hospitals. Results: Twenty centers received the questionnaires; however, complete data was obtained from 18. Most interventional cardiology units in Israel are merely engaged in percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). PCIs are executed mostly via the femoral artery, using almost exclusively stents, of which 36% were drug eluting. Noted was an infrequent use of other therapeutic, diagnostic devices, or femoral arteriotomy closure devices. Only 22% of the patients receive glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockers (GPB). Most centers used conventional unfractionated heparin dosing (70 u/kg) and did not routinely monitor activated clotting time. Abciximab, bivalirudin or enoxaparine were rarely used. All laboratories performed both elective and emergency-PCI, although 12 facilities were not supported by on-site surgical backup. Conclusion: Most cardiovascular intervention programs have restricted their activity to the coronary stenting, and are using a limited array of diagnostic and therapeutic devices, along with patient-tailored adjunctive pharmacotherapy, to sustain cost-effectiveness. Currently, ambulatory angiography and coronary interventions are not widely practiced in Israel.
AB - Objective: To assess the current practice of interventional cardiology in Israel. Method: Under the auspices of the 'Working group of interventional cardiology' of the 'Israel Heart Society,' a questionnaire regarding the practice of interventional cardiology sent to directors of interventional cardiology in all public hospitals. Results: Twenty centers received the questionnaires; however, complete data was obtained from 18. Most interventional cardiology units in Israel are merely engaged in percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). PCIs are executed mostly via the femoral artery, using almost exclusively stents, of which 36% were drug eluting. Noted was an infrequent use of other therapeutic, diagnostic devices, or femoral arteriotomy closure devices. Only 22% of the patients receive glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockers (GPB). Most centers used conventional unfractionated heparin dosing (70 u/kg) and did not routinely monitor activated clotting time. Abciximab, bivalirudin or enoxaparine were rarely used. All laboratories performed both elective and emergency-PCI, although 12 facilities were not supported by on-site surgical backup. Conclusion: Most cardiovascular intervention programs have restricted their activity to the coronary stenting, and are using a limited array of diagnostic and therapeutic devices, along with patient-tailored adjunctive pharmacotherapy, to sustain cost-effectiveness. Currently, ambulatory angiography and coronary interventions are not widely practiced in Israel.
KW - Bare metal stents
KW - Cardiac catheterization laboratories
KW - Drug eluting stents
KW - Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockers
KW - Percutaneous coronary interventions
KW - Unfractionated heparin
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34250772544&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/17482940701236786
DO - 10.1080/17482940701236786
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:34250772544
SN - 1748-2941
VL - 9
SP - 104
EP - 110
JO - Acute Cardiac Care
JF - Acute Cardiac Care
IS - 2
ER -