TY - JOUR
T1 - Interval to surgery after neoadjuvant treatment for colorectal cancer
AU - Wasserberg, Nir
PY - 2014/4/21
Y1 - 2014/4/21
N2 - The current standard treatment of low-lying locally advanced rectal cancer consists of chemoradiation followed by radical surgery. The interval between chemoradiation and surgery varied for many years until the 1999 Lyon R90-01 trial which compared the effects of a short (2-wk) and long (6-wk) interval. Results showed a better clinical tumor response (71.7% vs 53.1%) and higher rate of positive and pathologic tumor regression (26% vs 10.3%) after the longer interval. Accordingly, a 6-wk interval between chemoradiation and surgery was set to balance the oncological results with the surgical complexity. However, several recent retrospective studies reported that prolonging the interval beyond 8 or even 12 wk may lead to significantly higher rates of tumor downstaging and pathologic complete response. This in turn, according to some reports, may improve overall and disease-free survival, without increasing the surgical difficulty or complications. This work reviews the data on the effect of different intervals, derived mostly from retrospective analyses using a wide variation of treatment protocols. Prospective randomized trials are currently ongoing.
AB - The current standard treatment of low-lying locally advanced rectal cancer consists of chemoradiation followed by radical surgery. The interval between chemoradiation and surgery varied for many years until the 1999 Lyon R90-01 trial which compared the effects of a short (2-wk) and long (6-wk) interval. Results showed a better clinical tumor response (71.7% vs 53.1%) and higher rate of positive and pathologic tumor regression (26% vs 10.3%) after the longer interval. Accordingly, a 6-wk interval between chemoradiation and surgery was set to balance the oncological results with the surgical complexity. However, several recent retrospective studies reported that prolonging the interval beyond 8 or even 12 wk may lead to significantly higher rates of tumor downstaging and pathologic complete response. This in turn, according to some reports, may improve overall and disease-free survival, without increasing the surgical difficulty or complications. This work reviews the data on the effect of different intervals, derived mostly from retrospective analyses using a wide variation of treatment protocols. Prospective randomized trials are currently ongoing.
KW - Chemoradiation therapy
KW - Colorectal cancer
KW - Interval to surgery
KW - Neoadjuvant
KW - Rectal cancer
KW - Surgery
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84898841107&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3748/wjg.v20.i15.4256
DO - 10.3748/wjg.v20.i15.4256
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 24764663
AN - SCOPUS:84898841107
SN - 1007-9327
VL - 20
SP - 4256
EP - 4262
JO - World Journal of Gastroenterology
JF - World Journal of Gastroenterology
IS - 15
ER -