Inter-trial priming does not affect attentional priority in asymmetric visual search

Liana Amunts, Amit Yashar, Dominique Lamy*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

Visual search is considerably speeded when the target's characteristics remain constant across successive selections. Here, we investigated whether such inter-trial priming increases the target's attentional priority, by examining whether target repetition reduces search efficiency during serial search. As the study of inter-trial priming requires the target and distractors to exchange roles unpredictably, it has mostly been confined to singleton searches, which typically yield efficient search. We therefore resorted to two singleton searches known to yield relatively inefficient performance, that is, searches in which the target does not pop out. Participants searched for a veridical angry face among neutral ones or vice-versa, either upright or inverted (Experiment 1) or for a Q among Os or vice-versa (Experiment 2). In both experiments, we found substantial intertrial priming that did not improve search efficiency. In addition, intertrial priming was asymmetric and occurred only when the more salient target repeated. We conclude that intertrial priming does not modulate attentional priority allocation and that it occurs in asymmetric search only when the target is characterized by an additional feature that is consciously perceived.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberArticle 957
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume5
Issue numberAUG
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Funding

FundersFunder number
Bloom's Syndrome Foundation2009425

    Keywords

    • Attentional priority allocation
    • Inter-trial priming
    • Preattentive processing
    • Priming of pop-out
    • Search asymmetry
    • Serial search
    • Visual search

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Inter-trial priming does not affect attentional priority in asymmetric visual search'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this