TY - JOUR
T1 - Inter-device Variability of the Stratus Optical Coherence Tomography
AU - Barkana, Yaniv
AU - Burgansky-Eliash, Zvia
AU - Gerber, Yariv
AU - Melamed, Shlomo
AU - Neudorfer, Meira
AU - Avni, Isaac
AU - Bartov, Elisha
AU - Morad, Yair
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was funded by the Assaf Harofe Medical Center Research Fund, Zerifin, Israel. The authors indicate no financial conflict of interest. Involved in design and conduct of study (Y.B., Z.B.-E.); collection and management of data (Y.B., Z.B.-E., S.M., M.N., I.A., E.B.); analysis and interpretation of data (Y.B., Z.B.-E., Y.G., Y.M.); preparation of the manuscript (Y.B., Z.B.-E.); and review and approval of the manuscript (S.M., M.N., I.A., E.B., Y.M.). The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Assaf Harofe Medical Center and adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki, with written informed consent obtained from all participants.
PY - 2009/2
Y1 - 2009/2
N2 - Purpose: To assess inter-device measurement variability with the Stratus optical coherence tomography (OCT). Design: Evaluation of diagnostic test technology. Methods: Eight eyes of eight healthy subjects were examined with four different Stratus machines in four medical centers during a period of five hours using fast retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and fast macula protocols. Inter-device measurement variability and signal strength was assessed with standard deviation, coefficient of variance, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Spearman correlation coefficient was calculated between signal strength and thickness measurements. Results: Statistically significant differences were not found for all macular parameters and all but one RNFL parameter. Mean signal strengths obtained with the four Stratus machines were significantly different; the newer the machine, the stronger signal strength it produced. Some RNFL parameters were moderately and statistically significantly correlated with signal strength. Conclusions: We did not observe statistically significant differences in any macular and all but one RNFL parameter between the four Stratus OCT machines. Signal strength was significantly different between the machines, and significantly correlated with some RNFL parameters. Inter-machine variability in RNFL measurements may have clinical significance. Signal strength should be included in the assessment of measurements obtained on different machines and in serial examinations with a single Stratus machine during patient follow-up.
AB - Purpose: To assess inter-device measurement variability with the Stratus optical coherence tomography (OCT). Design: Evaluation of diagnostic test technology. Methods: Eight eyes of eight healthy subjects were examined with four different Stratus machines in four medical centers during a period of five hours using fast retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and fast macula protocols. Inter-device measurement variability and signal strength was assessed with standard deviation, coefficient of variance, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Spearman correlation coefficient was calculated between signal strength and thickness measurements. Results: Statistically significant differences were not found for all macular parameters and all but one RNFL parameter. Mean signal strengths obtained with the four Stratus machines were significantly different; the newer the machine, the stronger signal strength it produced. Some RNFL parameters were moderately and statistically significantly correlated with signal strength. Conclusions: We did not observe statistically significant differences in any macular and all but one RNFL parameter between the four Stratus OCT machines. Signal strength was significantly different between the machines, and significantly correlated with some RNFL parameters. Inter-machine variability in RNFL measurements may have clinical significance. Signal strength should be included in the assessment of measurements obtained on different machines and in serial examinations with a single Stratus machine during patient follow-up.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=58249118935&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.08.008
DO - 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.08.008
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:58249118935
SN - 0002-9394
VL - 147
SP - 260
EP - 266
JO - American Journal of Ophthalmology
JF - American Journal of Ophthalmology
IS - 2
ER -