TY - JOUR
T1 - Insulin dose optimization using an automated artificial intelligence-based decision support system in youths with type 1 diabetes
AU - NextDREAM Consortium
AU - Nimri, Revital
AU - Battelino, Tadej
AU - Laffel, Lori M.
AU - Slover, Robert H.
AU - Schatz, Desmond
AU - Weinzimer, Stuart A.
AU - Dovc, Klemen
AU - Danne, Thomas
AU - Phillip, Moshe
AU - Phillip, Moshe
AU - Nimri, Revital
AU - Shalitin, Shlomit
AU - Bello, Rachel
AU - Nevo-Shenker, Michal
AU - Fisch-Shvalb, Naama
AU - Shiovitch-Mantzuri, Galit
AU - Choresh, Orit
AU - Drutz, Irit
AU - Nava, Yehiel
AU - Hemo, Alona
AU - Hermon, Orna
AU - Nave, Rachel
AU - Battelino, Tadej
AU - Dovc, Klemen
AU - Bratina, Natasa
AU - Smigoe-Schweiger, Darja
AU - Mali, Brigita
AU - Gianini, Ana
AU - Sever, Urska
AU - Berkopec, Barbara Murn
AU - Laffel, Lori M.
AU - Katz, Michelle
AU - Isganaitis, Elvira
AU - Mehta, Sanjeev
AU - Quinn, Heidi
AU - Naik, Nisha
AU - Guo, Zijing
AU - Volkening, Lisa
AU - Slover, Robert H.
AU - Forlenza, Gregory
AU - Wadwa, R. Paul
AU - Alonso, G. Todd
AU - Messer, Laurel
AU - Towers, Lindsey
AU - Thivener, Katie
AU - Berget, Cari
AU - Lange, Samantha
AU - Jost, Emily
AU - Rossick-Solis, Maria
AU - Haller, Michael
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.
PY - 2020/9/1
Y1 - 2020/9/1
N2 - Despite the increasing adoption of insulin pumps and continuous glucose monitoring devices, most people with type 1 diabetes do not achieve their glycemic goals1. This could be related to a lack of expertise or inadequate time for clinicians to analyze complex sensor-augmented pump data. We tested whether frequent insulin dose adjustments guided by an automated artificial intelligence-based decision support system (AI-DSS) is as effective and safe as those guided by physicians in controlling glucose levels. ADVICE4U was a six-month, multicenter, multinational, parallel, randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial in 108 participants with type 1 diabetes, aged 10–21 years and using insulin pump therapy (ClinicalTrials.gov no. NCT03003806). Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive remote insulin dose adjustment every three weeks guided by either an AI-DSS, (AI-DSS arm, n = 54) or by physicians (physician arm, n = 54). The results for the primary efficacy measure—the percentage of time spent within the target glucose range (70–180 mg dl−1 (3.9–10.0 mmol l−1))—in the AI-DSS arm were statistically non-inferior to those in the physician arm (50.2 ± 11.1% versus 51.6 ± 11.3%, respectively, P < 1 × 10−7). The percentage of readings below 54 mg dl−1 (<3.0 mmol l−1) within the AI-DSS arm was statistically non-inferior to that in the physician arm (1.3 ± 1.4% versus 1.0 ± 0.9%, respectively, P < 0.0001). Three severe adverse events related to diabetes (two severe hypoglycemia, one diabetic ketoacidosis) were reported in the physician arm and none in the AI-DSS arm. In conclusion, use of an automated decision support tool for optimizing insulin pump settings was non-inferior to intensive insulin titration provided by physicians from specialized academic diabetes centers.
AB - Despite the increasing adoption of insulin pumps and continuous glucose monitoring devices, most people with type 1 diabetes do not achieve their glycemic goals1. This could be related to a lack of expertise or inadequate time for clinicians to analyze complex sensor-augmented pump data. We tested whether frequent insulin dose adjustments guided by an automated artificial intelligence-based decision support system (AI-DSS) is as effective and safe as those guided by physicians in controlling glucose levels. ADVICE4U was a six-month, multicenter, multinational, parallel, randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial in 108 participants with type 1 diabetes, aged 10–21 years and using insulin pump therapy (ClinicalTrials.gov no. NCT03003806). Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive remote insulin dose adjustment every three weeks guided by either an AI-DSS, (AI-DSS arm, n = 54) or by physicians (physician arm, n = 54). The results for the primary efficacy measure—the percentage of time spent within the target glucose range (70–180 mg dl−1 (3.9–10.0 mmol l−1))—in the AI-DSS arm were statistically non-inferior to those in the physician arm (50.2 ± 11.1% versus 51.6 ± 11.3%, respectively, P < 1 × 10−7). The percentage of readings below 54 mg dl−1 (<3.0 mmol l−1) within the AI-DSS arm was statistically non-inferior to that in the physician arm (1.3 ± 1.4% versus 1.0 ± 0.9%, respectively, P < 0.0001). Three severe adverse events related to diabetes (two severe hypoglycemia, one diabetic ketoacidosis) were reported in the physician arm and none in the AI-DSS arm. In conclusion, use of an automated decision support tool for optimizing insulin pump settings was non-inferior to intensive insulin titration provided by physicians from specialized academic diabetes centers.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85090495186&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41591-020-1045-7
DO - 10.1038/s41591-020-1045-7
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 32908282
AN - SCOPUS:85090495186
SN - 1078-8956
VL - 26
SP - 1380
EP - 1384
JO - Nature Medicine
JF - Nature Medicine
IS - 9
ER -