TY - JOUR
T1 - Insights Into Coronary Sinus Reducer Non-Responders
AU - Ponticelli, Francesco
AU - Khokhar, Arif A.
AU - Albani, Stefano
AU - Tzanis, Georgios
AU - Gallo, Francesco
AU - Guarracini, Stefano
AU - Banai, Shmuel
AU - Colombo, Antonio
AU - Giannini, Francesco
PY - 2021/11/1
Y1 - 2021/11/1
N2 - BACKGROUND: Refractory angina affects an increasing proportion of the population with advanced coronary artery disease and microvascular dysfunction. Limited effective pharmacological and interventional therapies exist for this patient cohort. The coronary sinus (CS) reducer, recently recommended in the 2019 guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology for the management of chronic refractory angina, is a balloon-expandable, stainless-steel device designed for implantation in the CS. It acts by increasing CS pressure, thereby redistributing blood to ischemic myocardium, relieving symptoms, and improving quality of life. However, between 15%-30% of patients do not respond to this treatment. Six mechanisms appear to explain this poor response to CS reducer therapy: (1) inappropriate patient selection; (2) cardiac venous system heterogeneity; (3) CS size; (4) incomplete device endothelialization; (5) coronary artery disease phenotype and progression; and (6) limited myocardial ischemia at baseline. We hereby review these mechanisms in detail and highlight key areas that should be addressed in order to try and reduce the burden of non-responders following CS reducer implantation.
AB - BACKGROUND: Refractory angina affects an increasing proportion of the population with advanced coronary artery disease and microvascular dysfunction. Limited effective pharmacological and interventional therapies exist for this patient cohort. The coronary sinus (CS) reducer, recently recommended in the 2019 guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology for the management of chronic refractory angina, is a balloon-expandable, stainless-steel device designed for implantation in the CS. It acts by increasing CS pressure, thereby redistributing blood to ischemic myocardium, relieving symptoms, and improving quality of life. However, between 15%-30% of patients do not respond to this treatment. Six mechanisms appear to explain this poor response to CS reducer therapy: (1) inappropriate patient selection; (2) cardiac venous system heterogeneity; (3) CS size; (4) incomplete device endothelialization; (5) coronary artery disease phenotype and progression; and (6) limited myocardial ischemia at baseline. We hereby review these mechanisms in detail and highlight key areas that should be addressed in order to try and reduce the burden of non-responders following CS reducer implantation.
KW - chronic coronary disease
KW - interventional cardiology
KW - percutaneous coronary intervention
KW - refractory angina
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85121946851&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 34544037
AN - SCOPUS:85121946851
SN - 1042-3931
VL - 33
SP - E884-E889
JO - Journal of Invasive Cardiology
JF - Journal of Invasive Cardiology
IS - 11
ER -