TY - JOUR
T1 - Inference of coseismic slip via joint inversion of GPS and aftershock data
T2 - The 2004 Parkfield example
AU - Ziv, A.
PY - 2012/3/1
Y1 - 2012/3/1
N2 - In many coseismic slip inversions, the number of model parameters is much larger than that of the independent observations, and the problem is extremely underdetermined. It is thus instructive to incorporate additional data sets into the slip inversion. In this study I describe a new approach for coseismic slip inversion, whereby both GPS displacements and first day aftershock rate changes are used jointly to constrain the solution. The joint inversion incorporates the Dieterich's aftershock model, which adopts a constitutive friction that depends logarithmically on the sliding rate. The method is applied to the 2004 Parkfield earthquake. The joint inversion not only provides resolving power of slip at depths inaccessible to GPS-only inversions, but it also helps to gain insight on the fault mechanical properties. I show that the data are consistent with the adopted aftershock model being the dominant mechanism for aftershock production along the Parkfield segment, and I obtain an upper bound on the friction dependence on the log of rate of fault patches that have experienced aftershock activity. A consequence of the irregular aftershock distribution is that the slip distribution is extremely nonsmooth, with the aftershock zones acting as barriers.
AB - In many coseismic slip inversions, the number of model parameters is much larger than that of the independent observations, and the problem is extremely underdetermined. It is thus instructive to incorporate additional data sets into the slip inversion. In this study I describe a new approach for coseismic slip inversion, whereby both GPS displacements and first day aftershock rate changes are used jointly to constrain the solution. The joint inversion incorporates the Dieterich's aftershock model, which adopts a constitutive friction that depends logarithmically on the sliding rate. The method is applied to the 2004 Parkfield earthquake. The joint inversion not only provides resolving power of slip at depths inaccessible to GPS-only inversions, but it also helps to gain insight on the fault mechanical properties. I show that the data are consistent with the adopted aftershock model being the dominant mechanism for aftershock production along the Parkfield segment, and I obtain an upper bound on the friction dependence on the log of rate of fault patches that have experienced aftershock activity. A consequence of the irregular aftershock distribution is that the slip distribution is extremely nonsmooth, with the aftershock zones acting as barriers.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84858325065&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1029/2011JB008400
DO - 10.1029/2011JB008400
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:84858325065
SN - 2169-9313
VL - 117
JO - Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
JF - Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
IS - 3
M1 - B03307
ER -