Induction of labor in nulliparous women with unfavorable cervix: a comparison of Foley catheter and vaginal prostaglandin E2

Yossi Mizrachi*, Michal Levy, Jacob Bar, Michal Kovo

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: To compare maternal and neonatal outcomes of two methods of labor induction in nulliparous women with unfavorable cervix. Methods: A case–control study was performed on nulliparous women with a cervical Bishop score < 6, who underwent induction of labor with either extra-amniotic Foley catheter (Foley catheter study group) or vaginal tablets of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2 control group). The control group was matched for gestational age and for the indication to induce labor. Results: A total of 346 nulliparous women were included. Similar rates of cesarean delivery were found in the Foley catheter and the PGE2 groups (25.4 vs. 24.2 %, respectively, p = 0.8), without differences in maternal or neonatal adverse outcomes. In the Foley catheter group, induction to delivery interval was shorter compared with the PGE2 group (25.1 vs. 36.6 h, respectively, p < 0.001), and more women delivered within 24 h (55.0 vs. 40.4 %, respectively, p = 0.01). Conclusion: Induction of labor with Foley catheter in nulliparous women with unfavorable cervix is associated with shorter induction to delivery interval, but with similar rates of cesarean deliveries and adverse pregnancy outcomes, as compared with vaginal tablets of PGE2.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)725-730
Number of pages6
JournalArchives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Volume294
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Oct 2016

Keywords

  • Foley catheter
  • Labor induction
  • Nulliparity
  • Prostaglandins

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Induction of labor in nulliparous women with unfavorable cervix: a comparison of Foley catheter and vaginal prostaglandin E2'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this